|
|
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
3.0 into my 1972
I'll be doing this probably next week, as soon as the 3.0 arrives. Can anyone point out any pitfalls to look out for? I'll be using my Webers and exhaust, fan, alternator, etc. from my old engine, distributor/wires/plugs are coming with the new engine. I'm guessing I'll be using the oil cooler from the 2.4 as well.
Thanks!
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
Check head studs.......
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Done. Engine passed PPI - no broken headstuds, and compression and leakdown, while not perfect, were within acceptable.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,213
|
Very cool Chris! Let me know if you need any help or tools for the drop and install. Is this engine number three for your car/garage? What are doing with the 2.4 and the 2.0?
BTW, I have some of your stuff (valve adjustment tool, some parts).....
__________________
1972 911T targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 895
|
3L into a 72
I am considering doing this as well. 3L into my 76 911s
What did you do about the cd ignition 6 plug vs 3plug. How about the flywheel and or starter gear. |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
I have MSD ignition, plus the wiring comes with the engine, so that shouldn't be a problem. 1972 is a 915 transmission, so the flywheel/starter gear should be identical.
Rich: probably don't *need* help (I've dropped the engine 3 or 4 times now) but you're more than welcome to come by. I was wondering what happened to my valve adjust tool! No matter, I've bought another one, so you can keep that. What else do you have?
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Cylinder head studs.......
Quote:
Christien, Are all the cylinder head studs made of steel for the exhaust sides? If they are steel, then they must have been done or replaced by PO. And that's a plus. Tony |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East TN
Posts: 477
|
You might want to check on how the tach is going to pull its pulse with your new motor.
I thought the 3.0L & its associated CD box set-up sent a different pulse than what the stock 72 was set up for. |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Will the tach adaptor from MSD not solve that problem?
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
Home of the Whopper
|
I put a 3.0 into a 73 a couple of years ago. The only "issue" I can think of is the wiring. A couple of connections needed to be switched around inside one of the 14 pin connectors. I used the 6 pin cdi and SC tach so maybe yours will be a little different with the MSD.
__________________
1968 912 coupe 1971 911E Targa rustbucket 1972 914 1.7 1987 924S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Looking forward to your install. I'd like to hear more about your experience when you go through it.
Out of curiousity, is the cooling in your 72 stock, and if so, is that sufficient for a 3.0L?
__________________
Von Whitley Los Alamos, NM |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East TN
Posts: 477
|
Quote:
However, I wanted the 73 style gauges in mine, so when I had North Hollywood Speedo refurbish my gauges, they told me that they made the tach 'universal' so that it would read the signal sent from any CD box....this allowed the tach to now read a signal sent from the CD box used by the 3.0L. So, Christien, I think will you will have to either pick up a SC tach to read the signal or get your 72 tach converted to 'universal'. A quick call to North Hollywood will confirm this. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I had a 3.0 in a '73 coupe years ago. It's transformative. You will enjoy the combination -- especially if you retain the 7:31 final drive. You may need auxiliary oil cooling capacity for long hard runs or track use.
__________________
techweenie | techweenie.com Marketing Consultant (expensive!) 1969 coupe hot rod 2016 Tesla Model S dd/parts fetcher |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
From what I've read, the additional oil capacity of the 1972 provides adequate cooling. Couple that with the fact that I don't drive car on really h
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
From what I've read, the additional oil capacity of the 1972 provides adequate cooling. Couple that with the fact that I don't drive car on really hot days and i should be ok. (haven't driven in almost 2 weeks dueto a heat wave in the high 90s)
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East TN
Posts: 477
|
+1
Just as a basis point, I do not have an additional oil cooler set-up on my 73 with the 3.0L. It runs very cool..... Good luck with the transplant procedure and let us know how it turns out. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Actually, I believe the '72 has less oil tank capacity than the previous and following years.
__________________
techweenie | techweenie.com Marketing Consultant (expensive!) 1969 coupe hot rod 2016 Tesla Model S dd/parts fetcher |
||
|
|
|