![]() |
|
|
|
Max Sluiter
|
998 spyshots
2012 Porsche 911 Caught Testing
They say the wheelbase is 4 inches longer. That is a lot but it does look a bit longer behind the door to the eye. I hope they left the engine where it was and moved the rear wheels back (or better still, the transaxle drive flanges) like they did for the first LWB models. This would decrease the polar moment of inertia and make for quicker turn-in and make the car more stable mid-corner. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Caracas Venezuela, Miami Florida
Posts: 768
|
i like. i dont know how much further back the could put the diff in the gearbox. id say it about as far back as mecanicaly possible.
i know ill get a lynching for this but i hope theres a mid engine 911 coming soon. . . maybe in a GT2 or GT3 version. Just looked at the side shot of the car. . . maybe its just me but i see the front wheels moved forward. Looks somewhat unbalanced overhangs front to rear now. im loving it tho!
__________________
theres nothing like the rear end squatdown of a turbo Last edited by esotoracing; 12-01-2010 at 10:35 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
I guess if the engine is in the middle, that would explain the wheelbase stretch.
![]() ![]()
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Blackbird Pilot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The OC
Posts: 2,112
|
Is it me or do the headlights remind of the 959? Bit more upright looking than a 997.
__________________
Reaper | The Outlaw 930 Hotrod Gruppe Fünf Gruppen.com | The Baddest 934/5 Parts for the 911/930 D-Zug.us |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Caracas Venezuela, Miami Florida
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
theres nothing like the rear end squatdown of a turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12
|
Looks good. I think I already prefer the new rear wing shape.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 5,885
|
Quote:
If that is what the headlights will look like, the car is going to be a step back in the looks department. Scott |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,051
|
Agree with Scott, the headlights look disguised. On the right side, there seems to be a hump in the bra-like film just behind the headlight. On the left side, the lower aspect of the headlight appears beneath the film and suggests the headlight is more of a kidney or teardrop shape and not as round or oval.
__________________
Ass-engine Nazi slot car -- PJ O'Rourke |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,051
|
Anyone think the pics of the rear suggest a hatchback?
__________________
Ass-engine Nazi slot car -- PJ O'Rourke |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Headlights are disguised but I do not see a hatchback in there.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
I don't get these comments....looks like a 997 wide body Turbo....nothing more and nothing less. Don't see the big changes .
Maybe the 4" extra wheelbase length ( if true) makes room for a flat-8 ???
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 7,017
|
The longer wheelbase (and size) is to comply with coming regulations regarding vehicle size and fuel economy. It sucks but the next 911 is going to be bigger (yet again).
__________________
Kurt |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Hood looks taller. Possibly to meet the new Euro pedestrian-impact standards?
I doubt (hope) that you'll ever see a mid-engined 911. The back seats are an important selling feature I believe. You'll see a mid-engined Corvette first. ![]()
__________________
1979 911SC "Frankencab" Dave |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Looks like the design is heading towards Panamera. Wrong direction, IMO.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Besides, aren't they building a Panamera coupe soon anyway? To make the iconic 911 resemble that line-up would be suicide.
__________________
1979 911SC "Frankencab" Dave |
||
![]() |
|
911 Abuser
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden, Övik
Posts: 39
|
I agree with Jeremy Clarcsson.
Lazy Porsche engineers wont bother to change anything, you can't tell one modern 911 from the other. Lets see some drastic new changes or at least some retro like modern ducktails, flatnoses, 959... |
||
![]() |
|
Kantry Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: N.S. Can
Posts: 6,822
|
I wonder if the 4 inch increase in wheelbase came about in the same fashion that Audi used to increase their wheelbase in the A7.
Audis and Porsches have had the clutch next to the engine, then the differential then the gearbox. With the A7, Audi found a way to move the differential closer to the engine and move the clutch closer to the transmission. With the fwd Audi, it meant moving the wheels forward while the engine stayed where it was, with an improvement in weight distribution. If Porsche managed the same trick, it would allow them to move the half-shafts rear-ward while keeping the engine in the same place for a longer wheelbase. I guess we'll see. Les
__________________
Best Les My train of thought has been replaced by a bumper car. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,181
|
7 speed Manuel would be interesting but having 4 gates rather than 3 could get confusing.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I don't know a thing about it, but it might not be a flat 8 this time, but the chassis may leave room for a "mid-life" update to include a new 8 cyl. engine.
|
||
![]() |
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
A flat eight or a mid engine is out of the question for a 911. It would be Porsche suicide.
It absolutely will not happen. |
||
![]() |
|