![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
|
How low can you go?
Assuming new rubber bushings, proper alignment and rack spacers, how low can an '86 911 with stock suspension and wheels/tires be lowered before having to add stiffer torsion bars and address bump steer? 25.5 front, 25 rear? How about 25 front, 24.5 rear?
__________________
1989 Carrera Former flings... 2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera Last edited by rw229; 01-13-2012 at 08:00 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I just did my spring plate bushings and was thinking the same thing. I imagine that it cant be much I have what I think is stock torsion tubes and unloaded they move quite a bit.
__________________
'78 911SC Targa (Back In Action!) '00 996 Carrera (New kid on the block) '87 944 (college DD - SOLD) '88 924s (high school DD - Gone to a better home) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
If you added rack spacers then bump steer has been addressed already.
24 rear, 24.5 front when measured at the fender lips is about as low, IMO, as practical for the street.
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
|
My ROW SC is on stock torsion bars and I have rack spacers. I lowered it 0.5" front and rear (25" front, 24.5" rear) and I'm running on 7's and 9'. I'm running I believe -1 degree of camber of front and -1.5 degree camber in the rear. I rubbed at the front left on the way home from the alignment shop, so I rolled my front fenders. I don't have a concernable amount of bump steer, but looking at the control arm and tie rod angle, if I lowered it much more I would.
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Bump steer is addressed by changing the geometry of the suspension. In front the easiest change is rack spacers that raise the steering rack, also available are o/s tie rods, both are intended to restore the stock relationship between steering and A arm travel arcs more involved steps are raising the spindle height on the strut and decambering ball joints
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
|
Will - your car looks like what I'm thinking
Bill - Thanks, I understand there are all sorts of ways to correct the suspension geometry, raising the spindles, etc. My goal is ~25/24.5 and want to make sure that I'm not getting in to that territory. At this height, will I be OK with suspension travel and tie rod angles? (using rack spacers) Will the stock t-bars be stiff enough to prevent bottoming?
__________________
1989 Carrera Former flings... 2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Some of the SC era cars came w/ shock bumpers that would need to be removed, and Bilsteins do provide a little more spring rate than other shocks
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
|
Thanks for the confirmation. Now to figure out what the actual measurements/angles need to be to get that height.
The car actually has new Bilstein HDs all around. Quote:
__________________
1989 Carrera Former flings... 2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
|
Quote:
Here you go. 911 Spring Plate Angle Calculator To get my ride height, I used the angle midway between "Euro" and "Race" ride height. |
||
![]() |
|