Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
How low can you go?

Assuming new rubber bushings, proper alignment and rack spacers, how low can an '86 911 with stock suspension and wheels/tires be lowered before having to add stiffer torsion bars and address bump steer? 25.5 front, 25 rear? How about 25 front, 24.5 rear?

__________________
1989 Carrera

Former flings...
2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera

Last edited by rw229; 01-13-2012 at 08:00 PM..
Old 01-13-2012, 07:57 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Dave Colangelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,812
Garage
I just did my spring plate bushings and was thinking the same thing. I imagine that it cant be much I have what I think is stock torsion tubes and unloaded they move quite a bit.
__________________
'78 911SC Targa (Back In Action!)
'00 996 Carrera (New kid on the block)
'87 944 (college DD - SOLD)
'88 924s (high school DD - Gone to a better home)
Old 01-13-2012, 08:20 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Oh Haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
If you added rack spacers then bump steer has been addressed already.

24 rear, 24.5 front when measured at the fender lips is about as low, IMO, as practical for the street.
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015
Pacific Blue

Wayne
Old 01-14-2012, 05:18 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
My ROW SC is on stock torsion bars and I have rack spacers. I lowered it 0.5" front and rear (25" front, 24.5" rear) and I'm running on 7's and 9'. I'm running I believe -1 degree of camber of front and -1.5 degree camber in the rear. I rubbed at the front left on the way home from the alignment shop, so I rolled my front fenders. I don't have a concernable amount of bump steer, but looking at the control arm and tie rod angle, if I lowered it much more I would.



Old 01-14-2012, 07:24 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 26,408
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by rw229 View Post
Assuming new rubber bushings, proper alignment and rack spacers, how low can an '86 911 with stock suspension and wheels/tires be lowered before having to add stiffer torsion bars and address bump steer? 25.5 front, 25 rear? How about 25 front, 24.5 rear?
stiffer suspension only addresses bump steer issues in so far as it limits the range of suspension motion, less motion = less total toe and camber change from suspension motion.

Bump steer is addressed by changing the geometry of the suspension. In front the easiest change is rack spacers that raise the steering rack, also available are o/s tie rods, both are intended to restore the stock relationship between steering and A arm travel arcs

more involved steps are raising the spindle height on the strut and decambering ball joints
__________________
Bill Verburg
'76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone)
| Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes |
Old 01-14-2012, 07:30 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
Will - your car looks like what I'm thinking

Bill - Thanks, I understand there are all sorts of ways to correct the suspension geometry, raising the spindles, etc. My goal is ~25/24.5 and want to make sure that I'm not getting in to that territory.

At this height, will I be OK with suspension travel and tie rod angles? (using rack spacers) Will the stock t-bars be stiff enough to prevent bottoming?
__________________
1989 Carrera

Former flings...
2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera
Old 01-14-2012, 07:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 26,408
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by rw229 View Post
Will - your car looks like what I'm thinking

Bill - Thanks, I understand there are all sorts of ways to correct the suspension geometry, raising the spindles, etc. My goal is ~25/24.5 and want to make sure that I'm not getting in to that territory.

At this height, will I be OK with suspension travel and tie rod angles? (using rack spacers) Will the stock t-bars be stiff enough to prevent bottoming?
When I used to track my C3 I ran it t 25/24.5" w/ 16" wheels and 205/55 & 245/45 tires, stock t-bars & sways, Bilstein sport and a rack spacer. There was never any bottoming issue. The difference today is that tires are much stickier but I think you will be fine w/ just a rack spacer.

Some of the SC era cars came w/ shock bumpers that would need to be removed, and Bilsteins do provide a little more spring rate than other shocks
__________________
Bill Verburg
'76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone)
| Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes |
Old 01-14-2012, 08:21 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 560
Thanks for the confirmation. Now to figure out what the actual measurements/angles need to be to get that height.

The car actually has new Bilstein HDs all around.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Verburg View Post
When I used to track my C3 I ran it t 25/24.5" w/ 16" wheels and 205/55 & 245/45 tires, stock t-bars & sways, Bilstein sport and a rack spacer. There was never any bottoming issue. The difference today is that tires are much stickier but I think you will be fine w/ just a rack spacer.

Some of the SC era cars came w/ shock bumpers that would need to be removed, and Bilsteins do provide a little more spring rate than other shocks
__________________
1989 Carrera

Former flings...
2009 Carrera S (x2), 1986 Carrera, 1997 993, 1983 911SC, 1995 993, 1987 Carrera, 1985 Carrera
Old 01-14-2012, 08:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by rw229 View Post
Thanks for the confirmation. Now to figure out what the actual measurements/angles need to be to get that height.

The car actually has new Bilstein HDs all around.

Here you go.

911 Spring Plate Angle Calculator

To get my ride height, I used the angle midway between "Euro" and "Race" ride height.

Old 01-14-2012, 09:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:59 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.