![]() |
Quote:
Wayne makes an excellent point when he suggests that chipping a car may lead to a need for higher octane fuel. However, if you are already using premium, and have unrestricted access to it, then a chip and exhaust upgrade would be the easy way to a little more of what Dr Porsche intended form these cars. Has anyone EVER posted a thread about how they damaged their 911 with a SW chip ? EVER ? LOTS of testimonials and real world results. One has to wonder about the repeated and unending attacks on a credible chip tuner with lots of happy customers. What is it about ? BTW, Steve isn't the only guy to tune 911 chip. He is just the best known and longest standing. |
And what is happening here?
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/684237-misfire-track.html |
Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/suppo...s/a_frusty.gif |
It would be virtually impossible to program every possible condition into the chip. I wouldnt be so fast to dismiss the possibility that the chip contributed to this. too many unknown variables.
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've been researching chips for a while, and Loren's initial point (10 years ago) is reasonable and seemed to merit some consideration. At this point, however, the new dialog has done nothing to add new information beyond FUD (fear, uncertainy, doubt). Anyway, I'm kicking myself for being dragged into this troll. With apologies, I will politely remove myself from the conversation. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/sad2.gif |
Don't have any relation business or other wise with either implied party in this discussion, however, following some type of controlled method of observation/experimentation of the so called performance chips has little relevance here.
The OP made his own tests and his own modifications and his own observations of his own methods---- and said, 'this doesn't do anything- clearly BS'------ How is this a valid observation of another's product when another's product wasn't even used? |
Quote:
|
"It would be virtually impossible to program every possible condition into the chip. I wouldnt be so fast to dismiss the possibility that the chip contributed to this. too many unknown variables."
Exactly! And that's the whole Mickey Mouse thing about 'performance' tuning! And it appears that an engine (3.2) was damaged/destroyed in Orange County in the last few months during a 'tuning' session. Could this be related to too much 'pushed' timing for that extra HP also? Actually, information from the session was that the engine was advanced too much. "Just as predicted, typical response of a weasel. Looks like someone can't walk the talk is trying to crawl back into his hole. Absolute coward!" Speaks to one's character! |
don't let him make you mad
|
Quote:
It could be related to many, many things. This is a statement of the unknown. |
Weaseling again? So now you're implying an engine was destroyed during one of my tuning sessions? Never happened so cut the BS while you're ahead.
So why don't you pony up and show us all what you claim? Or afraid of everyone seeing your true character? |
At the end of the day. Both Loren and Steve are right. There are too many factors involved in how a car engine performs. There is more to performance than Fuel and Timing maps. Hell, Altitude, Humidity, Fuel Quality, Ambient Temps, Engine Temps, Load extremes, can impact this stuff. Can Loren say that a chip caused a engine to blow with 100% certainity. No. Can Steve say that his chips consider all factors 100% and that they would NEVER contribute to a engine blowing? No. Come on guys. This is ridiculous on both sides.
|
Quote:
Steve W has posted quite a few dyno results, and has had lots of great, logical comments that make sense, on many different topics. He has been a valuable contributor to Pelican. Lorenfb, on the other hand, has only one "point" to make over and over: "All aftermarket chips are worthless. No one can improve on what the factory did". My car gained 1.5 seconds per lap with nothing more than a chip change. According to lorenfb, that was not possible. |
One things for sure,
Discussions like this can only be good for the potential consumer, ie; the more threads that Loren starts about after market chips, the more people get curious, therefore, the more chips get tried, the more info we all have from individuals on their personal findings. Going on past testamonials here so far, the deck is already stacked! A... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Scott |
let me rephrase -- Both raise some valid questions and make some valid points...
Quote:
|
I'm thinking that this might get Loren banned.
Please let it be so.. |
Don't ban lorenfb!
Don't ban lorenfb! He has just as much right to say stupid things just like everyone else on this board and besides he is the only one with the guts to call out Steve Wong. Steve happily plays along with lorenfb and gets into it with him. The fact of the matter is this, lorenfb has yet to show anyone on this board that his claims are actually provable and let alone true. So don't ban him, he has right to talk out of his tail as well. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/wat.gifhttp://forums.pelicanparts.com/suppo...eys/loki16.gif
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website