![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Rear fender rubbing
Hi guys - been distracted with "life" and other things to have to deal with but am finally getting a chance to get back to the 911. My car is a '74 with a 3.2 and I have an issue with fender rubbing that looks to be wheel travel related rather than side to side movement.
The last run I ran her aggressively was on a fast road touring event and I got fender blistering on both sides from where it tires appear to have made contact. She has 26mm rear bars and adjustable spring plates that I put on, and she was professionally corner balanced and aligned. Her rear shocks are Bilstein from about 10 years ago but have under 17k miles on them. To prevent this from happening again do I "just" need to raise the ride height fractionally? I don't want to kill the ride quality but would a thicker rear bar help or is there another way I should be thinking about this? Thanks - and best wishes to everyone on a happy Holiday season.
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What wheels and what size tires are you using?
__________________
Pete 79 911SC RoW "Tornadoes come out of frikkin nowhere. One minute everything is all sunshine and puppies the next thing you know you've got flying cows".- Stomachmonkey |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Hi Pete - sorry, that is pretty important info which I neglected to provide. Sorry, not enough coffee yet.
She has 205/55/16 all the way around currently. I have a set 16x7 (951) wheels that I have not mounted yet.
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,492
|
You need the 25.5mm Carrera bars in the rear for the extra weight in the rear from the aluminum engine. The rear of the car is sagging and the Carrera bars will support the extra weight and handle the spirited driving minimising the rear bar travel.
Bruce |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Hi Bruce - thanks for the response. Wouldn't the 26mm bars handle that already?
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Since you haven't mounted the 7x16's(944 and 911 Fuchs in that size have the same ET) are we to assume that what is on the car are 6x16? or 911 7x16? In either case a 205/50 would be shorter and less likely to blister the fender
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 Last edited by tdskip; 12-23-2012 at 08:33 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
You want a shorter tire
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Hi Bill - thanks for the thoughts. The current rims should have some sort of stamping where I can confirm their actual size, right?
I'm a 911 newbie and this xar was badly hacked so I've learned to not make ANY assumptions. Thanks again
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Caveman Hammer Mechanic
|
Hey,
My '75 911 with the stock 2.7 and 205/50x16 all around rubbed. The stock t-bars were installed. Larger t-bars will indeed limit wheel travel, possibly enough to drive, but the fact remains, you have a clearance issue between the tire and body. Solution, narrower tires, solid struts instead of shocks to prevent wheel travel or trimming/rolling the fender to provide clearance. Your car should have no interference at any potential wheel travel. Common wisdom has been that the Middies like 21/27mm t-bars, and the 3.2 Carerra with 22/28mm as a starting point. I rolled my fenders for clearance and many others have trimmed the lip, either will work. Good luck eric
__________________
1984 Carrera El Chupacabra 1974 Toyota FJ40 Turbo Diesel "Easy, easy, this car is just the right amount of chitty" "America is all about speed. Hot,nasty, bad ass speed." Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Thanks Eric - so it looks like I "get" to reindex the rear suspension again...
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
A shorter tire will help a lot. The 205/55-16 is very tall. A 50 series will help significantly. Also, more negative camber will help. Last, a larger rear sway bar will help too.
If those items don't work, raise ride height and/or stiffer torsion bars. Skinny tires are a last resort! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered User
|
She doesn't have a rear bar at this point, should of noted that. Sorry.
So the idea being that better controlling lean will limited total vertical travel (except for a straight on significant impact/depression in the road of course)? Sounds like the tires need to go in any case. Thanks for the coaching.
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I ran a 205/55-16 on a lowered suspension without a rear bar. It rubbed significantly, even with 30mm torsion bars.
I added a sway bar (tarrett) and it improved significantly. Then, shorter tires and some negative camber and no more issues. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Size, this one is a 9x15 ![]() part #, this one is a 911 8x16 ![]()
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oxford, Ct.
Posts: 2,295
|
Bill, as usual, Is correct. Those are 16x7 wheels and unless you put a lot o rear bar- torsion and sway they will not work if you push the car
PS Merry Christmas fella's
__________________
07 GT3 Cup S 4.0, 00 986, 78 911 old school gt car 77 BMW R100S 99 Ducati 996S 04 BMW R1150R DanielJacobsLLC.com |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Hi guys - belated Happy New Year to everyone.
I pulled the existing rear wheels and they are 7jx16, as are the "new" ones sourced from a 951. Is there any advantage on running the 951 ones here to deal with rubbing, or are the offsets the same? Baring any advantage from the 951 rims it looks like a rear bar and lower profile tires are the next steps? Sound right? Thanks guys.
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
|
The 951 will only allow bigger brake options. The offset is the same as the 911 wheel. I'd try a rear bar, then lower profile tires, and then ride height.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
Thanks Will, appreciate the coaching.
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
![]() |
|