Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   YACTT (Yet Another CIS Troubleshooting Thread)... (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/743295-yactt-yet-another-cis-troubleshooting-thread.html)

m1sandman 04-06-2013 06:32 PM

YACTT (Yet Another CIS Troubleshooting Thread)...
 
Howdy,
I recently acquired a 74 that had been sitting for roughly two years. The PO said the Fuel Distributor was stuck and he used B12 to get it moving again and the flapper moves well when you move it manually. He said that the WUR was rebuilt but I don't know how long ago that was. It took a week or two but we were finally able to get spark (should have started with the points instead of ending with them, but lesson learned).

I've read a bunch of threads on the pressures and found reference to the 74 having a system pressure of 70psi and a control pressure ~50psi. I've been able to test system pressure and it is 70psi, but the gauge that came with the car had very old lines on it and they blew shortly after. I've borrowed another gauge from a friend but its will take some fiddling to get it in line the correct direction to get the Control pressure.

In the meantime, I pulled the WUR and checked the screen and it had some nastiness about it, so its been cleaned with carb cleaner and reinstalled. I have run low pressure air through the fuel return lines and they appear to be flowing properly. The car will start with the throttle lever in the up position, but then dies immediately, then will normally backfire the next time I try to start it (luckily it came with a stainless airbox with pop-off valve). We can get the car to run by starting then immediately manipulating the flapper in the airbox to allow more fuel, and as long as that is happening, the car will run.

Obviously without a control pressure its very hard to tell, but based on the other threads I've read and consulting with my local Porsche CIS guru my initial thought is the WUR needs to be rebuilt. Have I missed any other tests that might point us in a different direction?

Thanks!
Steve
Tampa, FL

boyt911sc 04-06-2013 07:55 PM

CIS troubleshooting.......
 
Steve,

May I ask you this question before you decide to have the WUR rebuild? What made you think the WUR needs a rebuild? What's the number (ID) on the WUR? Have you tested the WUR?

A fuel pressure gauge kit is mandatory for fuel injection system troubleshooting. Without one, you'll be doing a lot of guess-work and could be a very expensive way to fix a simple problem.

I'm no expert by any means, but I have not encountered a CIS problem that could not be diagnosed correctly by a DIY'er like you or me. There are simple tests and procedures that you could do to verify and confirm the condition of almost every individual CIS components in your car using ordinary tools excluding CDI and exhaust composition analysis.
Keep us posted.

Tony

allaircooled 04-06-2013 08:00 PM

Check this site out if you haven't already.

Welcome to the forum by the way. Nice to see someone local to me. :)

m1sandman 04-06-2013 08:14 PM

Chris, Thank you for the welcome! I'm glad to be here... My brother and father both have 911's and I finally was able to join them. I've been all over that site you linked me to -- it is a great resource and helped me determine the flow so I could identify the return lines!

Tony, I've read lots of the posts that you have contributed to for CIS troubleshooting, which is why I know the importance of pressure testing, etc, and I'm glad you have entered the thread as I respect your help a lot. I have to swap around some fittings on the loaner gauge that I have now before I can test the control pressure, but will be able to do that tomorrow at the earliest but more likely one evening this week. To answer your questions:

1. "What made you think the WUR needs a rebuild?" At this point its been a process of elimination -- I know the system pressure is within spec (measured at 70psi). I know the cold start valve is working, I know I'm getting fuel to the injectors if I lift the flapper manually, I know that the return lines are not clogged (I found that in several of the threads you had commented on), and I now know the screen in the WUR is not clogged. I'm sure there are other things I should be testing and don't have the knowledge of yet, but thats why I'm posting.

2. "What's the number (ID) on the WUR?" I will have to pull it again and look -- i had it out today and should have written in down but didn't, and now I don't remember off the top of my head.

3. "Have you tested the WUR?" I have not and would appreciate any advice on properly testing the WUR.

Thanks for the replies Gents! I'm looking forward to getting this one back on the road...

manbridge 74 04-06-2013 08:31 PM

Another 74. Willkommen.

Post a pic of your sweet ride tout sweet if at all possible.

I would be curious as to your WUR number as well.

Along with fuel pressures, has everything else involved with a basic tuneup been checked/completed?

allaircooled 04-06-2013 08:34 PM

Can't believe I forgot to ask you to post pictures! Most important! Heck I am flying home on Wednesday for a couple of weeks, maybe you would like to show me your new ride in person.

m1sandman 04-06-2013 08:53 PM

Hi Manbridge,
We've got fresh gasoline, the leaking fuel lines replaced, fresh oil and we're running with the airbox open for now. Outside of that, been pretty focused on 1) getting spark and 2) now getting fuel ;)

Chris, would love to get together... PM me and we'll swap contact info!

Here are a few pics since you guys requested them...
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1365310255.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1365310285.jpg
Ready for the trip home...
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1365310323.jpg
Finally in its new home (thats my brothers 73 targa behind)...
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1365310341.jpg

allaircooled 04-06-2013 08:58 PM

Wow is that the original color? I'm liking it.

m1sandman 04-06-2013 09:15 PM

Yep, original color tho its much patchier than it appears in the pictures. I'm the third owner... the gentleman I purchased it from bought it in 1980 and it was a well maintained and well loved vehicle. Its got basically no rust (just a little at the base of the A pillars that has been touched up) and all the reliability upgrades had been done on the engine.

Was just surfing the Rat Rod thread and think it would definitely fit nicely in that category.

theFONZ 04-06-2013 10:08 PM

Vacuum leaks will wreak havoc on a CIS system. You need to make sure you don't have any before swapping parts and adjusting stuff. Do a search for vacuum leak tester, and there are a few threads of homemade setups.

And definately get a proper CIS fuel tester.

boyt911sc 04-07-2013 05:36 AM

Fuel pressure test........
 
Steve,

Find the correct fuel pressure gauge kit. The 'kit' is installed between FD (fuel distributor) and WUR. Break the connection at the WUR side. Some illustrations from manuals show the installation at the FD. I strongly suggest to do it @ WUR. You could try the installation at either sides and you'll experience why.

Your '74 should have a running FP when the ignition is @ ON/RUN (not start). No need to run the engine to test your WUR. With the fuel pressure gauge properly connected between the WUR & FD, you are ready for the test.

1). Disconnect the electrical plug to the WUR for cold control fuel pressure check. Turn ignition SW @ ON position. Record reading.

2). Next, connect the electrical plug (WUR) and observe the control pressure rise over time. Record the pressure reading versus time. Example: 30, 60, 90, 120 sec......and so on until the control fuel pressure stabilizes probably around 4 mins. or so. Keep reading until the pressure stopped going up and record the time in minutes. These numbers I coined it as your WUR profile (baseline data).

Before doing the test, measure the resistance in your WUR by using a multi-tester set @ resistance (Ohms). The WUR's for the early CIS ('73.5 -'74) are getting harder to find these days. Keep us posted.

Tony

m1sandman 04-07-2013 06:07 AM

Fonz, thanks for the suggestions on the vacuum leak. I did purchase new injector seals and haven't installed those yet, so i'll move towards the top of the list. That search was a good one, after I do the CIS pressure tests I'll to the reverse vacuum cleaner with soapy water spray test.

Tony, thanks for the steps. I'll get the pressure tester setup with the valve on the correct side and test, then post the values and the part number for the WUR. As an aside, can you tell me which of the pins on the WUR is the 12v connection and which is ground? Is the pin closest to the inlet and outlet ports the power side?
Thanks to all for the help!

ossiblue 04-07-2013 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7372919)
Fonz, thanks for the suggestions on the vacuum leak. I did purchase new injector seals and haven't installed those yet, so i'll move towards the top of the list. That search was a good one, after I do the CIS pressure tests I'll to the reverse vacuum cleaner with soapy water spray test.

Tony, thanks for the steps. I'll get the pressure tester setup with the valve on the correct side and test, then post the values and the part number for the WUR. As an aside, can you tell me which of the pins on the WUR is the 12v connection and which is ground? Is the pin closest to the inlet and outlet ports the power side?
Thanks to all for the help!

One caution.

You have a 74. If the CIS is stock, you have a slightly different set up between the fuel distributor and the wur. The 74 uses a throttle positioner valve that is fed from a line coming from the fuel distributor. This line shares an outlet port with the line that goes to the wur. When you connect your test gauge between the fuel distributor and wur, the line that goes to the throttle valve must be on the wur side of the gauge. That will mean you will have to connect your gauge set directly to the FD after removing the banjo fitting that supplies the throttle valve, and reconnect the banjo fitting between the outlet of the gauge set hose and the line to the wur.

I defer to Tony on most things CIS as his expertise is proven. However, I do know that most of his work is done with later models and the throttle valve only was on 73.5 and 74 model CIS engines.

If you are not sure what I just described, take a look at your fuel distributor where the line to the wur emanates. Is there a banjo fitting on there with a line that runs back to the throttle body? Please let us know.

BTW, it doesn't matter which pin is hot and which is ground.

m1sandman 04-07-2013 06:45 AM

LJ, thanks for the tip -- I'm learning that my car is slightly different than most of the CIS cars I'm finding tips for (for instance, I don't have a relay and fuse in the rear panel for the WUR, but I did find reference on one of the forums to a 74 with the power for the WUR coming straight off the alternator (which is why I never get 12v when I test it). The factory shop manual that my brother has shows the relay and fuse in the current flow diagrams for the 73 911T and the 74, so I think mine must be an inbetweener.

All that being said, there is a banjo fitting just inside the line that runs from the FD to the WUR, but I have not traced it yet. Safe to assume this is the one you are talking about? That also complicates my gauge setup, so it may take a little more time to get readings -- i'll take a look at the fittings today and see what all i need to swap out on the gauge.

95avblm3 04-07-2013 07:08 AM

Steve,

Slightly off-topic, but here is another thread to keep in your back pocket should other issues creep up down the road (which it will): http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/664950-1976-911s-garage-find-road.html.

It's a fun read by a guy who has a car similar to you...

Welcome to the 911 club.SmileWavy

Jeremy

Paulporsche 04-07-2013 07:12 AM

Just wanted to add because I don't think I saw them mentioned:

When you construct the WUR Profile that Tony mentioned, make sure the engine is cold (hasn't been run in at least 4 hrs) and record the ambient temperature for the first cold control pressure test. The required CCP varies w/ the ambient temp.

If your resistance of the bimetal arm is within spec, you may find that the CCP just needs to be reset via the "knocking the plug" procedure, rather than rebuilding.

It's also important to know your CO% but for now the fuel pressures are more important.

Vacuum leaks can be located in some very hard places to find. I had a paper thin spot worn almost through the aluminum pipe that went to the AAR on my engine. 30+ years of rubbing against the engine oil cooler had produced a small spot in the wall that I was able to flex like a piece of tissue. I had 3 mechanics tell me I had no vacuum leaks, but if there wasn't one at the time, there was going to quickly be a massive one!

Through a lot of help and patience from Tony and others I was able to repair that area and reset the control pressures. The engine hasn't run so well in years!

Always make sure that all your ignition parts are operating within spec before you move on to CIS components.

boyt911sc 04-07-2013 07:14 AM

You are indeed correct........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ossiblue (Post 7372962)
One caution.

You have a 74. If the CIS is stock, you have a slightly different set up between the fuel distributor and the wur. The 74 uses a throttle positioner valve that is fed from a line coming from the fuel distributor. This line shares an outlet port with the line that goes to the wur. When you connect your test gauge between the fuel distributor and wur, the line that goes to the throttle valve must be on the wur side of the gauge. That will mean you will have to connect your gauge set directly to the FD after removing the banjo fitting that supplies the throttle valve, and reconnect the banjo fitting between the outlet of the gauge set hose and the line to the wur.

I defer to Tony on most things CIS as his expertise is proven. However, I do know that most of his work is done with later models and the throttle valve only was on 73.5 and 74 model CIS engines.

If you are not sure what I just described, take a look at your fuel distributor where the line to the wur emanates. Is there a banjo fitting on there with a line that runs back to the throttle body? Please let us know.

BTW, it doesn't matter which pin is hot and which is ground.



Larry,

You are correct. There is slight different in the set-up for the '73.5 - '74 CIS compared to the SC's. I have over-looked this difference. Thanks for catching it.

Tony

manbridge 74 04-07-2013 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7372980)
LJ, thanks for the tip -- I'm learning that my car is slightly different than most of the CIS cars I'm finding tips for (for instance, I don't have a relay and fuse in the rear panel for the WUR, but I did find reference on one of the forums to a 74 with the power for the WUR coming straight off the alternator (which is why I never get 12v when I test it). The factory shop manual that my brother has shows the relay and fuse in the current flow diagrams for the 73 911T and the 74, so I think mine must be an inbetweener.

All that being said, there is a banjo fitting just inside the line that runs from the FD to the WUR, but I have not traced it yet. Safe to assume this is the one you are talking about? That also complicates my gauge setup, so it may take a little more time to get readings -- i'll take a look at the fittings today and see what all i need to swap out on the gauge.

This is correct. 74 911s have no power to the WUR until engine is running. Also, they came with a one wire WUR so you need to post the number off of yours to determine if the one you have is the proper replacement.

m1sandman 04-07-2013 05:23 PM

Ok, I was able to get 2 pieces of information today on the WUR. The last 3 of the part number are 009 (see attached picture), and the resistance measured at 32.2 ohms.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to get some different adapters to be able to run a control pressure test because of the banjo fitting inside the fuel line between FD and WUR. Anyone know the specs on the threads I need to have to be able to screw into the FD and accept the fitting including the banjo on the other end of the gauge?

WUR:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1365384212.jpg

m1sandman 04-07-2013 05:25 PM

BTW, those of you with 74's, you mind posting pictures? I'd love to see what colors, ride heights, and wheel configurations you all are running.
Thanks!

allaircooled 04-07-2013 05:36 PM

If you don't get the cis gauge figured out, I can let you borrow mine when I get back in town. You might have it done by then though. ;)

m1sandman 04-07-2013 05:45 PM

Thanks Chris... I may have to. The borrowed one that I have doesn't have the right fitting to screw directly into the top of the FD on the 74. If I didn't have to worry about the banjo fitting inside the port headed for the WUR, I would have been able to get readings today!

m1sandman 04-09-2013 03:46 AM

So gents, is there anything else I can be troubleshooting before I get a gauge to read control pressure? I've got new injector seals to be installed, so I can go ahead and do those...

theFONZ 04-09-2013 04:15 AM

You could do the vacuum leak test and order what you need to replace along with the fuel tester.

m1sandman 04-10-2013 04:52 PM

Ok, so I'd like to do some vacuum tests this weekend as was reading this thread:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/717648-finding-cis-vacuum-leaks-vacuum-cleaner-pressure-test-2.html

It sounds like you can pressurize the system through the exhaust, which would be an easy way of doing it, but is there any concern about blowing anything nasty back into the engine? Or should I just pull the airbox and do it from the top?

Thanks!

allaircooled 04-10-2013 06:28 PM

I am going to perform this test too but I was going to try to do it from the top. I have no experience yet with a vacuum leak test so I don't know if one way is better than the other though.

m1sandman 04-10-2013 06:41 PM

Hey Chris! You back in town yet? Send me a PM with some contact info and maybe we could meet up this weekend...

m1sandman 04-15-2013 05:56 PM

Ok CIS Fuel Pressure experts -- what kind of adapter do i need (and where can I get it) to adapt the hose the normally screws onto the outlet of the FD to now go between the FD fitting with the Banjo fitting and the FD itself? Anyone got any specs? Does the house unscrew from the FD fitting, then that fitting unscrew (with the banjo in place) from the top of the FD? is it male going into the top of the FD?

I was able to replace the injector seals and straighten the Pop-off plate in my airbox this weekend, which I was hoping would help a little, but I think there is still too much control pressure for it to start and run.

Thanks!

boyt911sc 04-15-2013 06:32 PM

Good spot to hook up the gauge.......
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7388327)
Ok CIS Fuel Pressure experts -- what kind of adapter do i need (and where can I get it) to adapt the hose the normally screws onto the outlet of the FD to now go between the FD fitting with the Banjo fitting and the FD itself? Anyone got any specs? Does the house unscrew from the FD fitting, then that fitting unscrew (with the banjo in place) from the top of the FD? is it male going into the top of the FD?

I was able to replace the injector seals and straighten the Pop-off plate in my airbox this weekend, which I was hoping would help a little, but I think there is still too much control pressure for it to start and run.

Thanks!



Break the fuel line fitting at the WUR. I'm away from home traveling and if my memory serves me right, the thread should be 10 mm x 1.25 (?). Stay away from the FD and try to do your work at the WUR for fuel pressure tests.

Tony

ossiblue 04-15-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boyt911sc (Post 7388395)
Break the fuel line fitting at the WUR. I'm away from home traveling and if my memory serves me right, the thread should be 10 mm x 1.25 (?). Stay away from the FD and try to do your work at the WUR for fuel pressure tests.

Tony

Tony, remember he has a 74 with the throttle positioner and fuel hose coming from the FD which needs to be connected on the wur side of the gauge set.

prebordao 04-16-2013 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boyt911sc (Post 7388395)
Break the fuel line fitting at the WUR. I'm away from home traveling and if my memory serves me right, the thread should be 10 mm x 1.25 (?). Stay away from the FD and try to do your work at the WUR for fuel pressure tests.

Tony

The line that goes to the WUR is a nylon one. try not to mess with it as they're a pain to refit.

prebordao 04-16-2013 02:37 AM

m1sandman I guess your car is lime green ?

Mine is also, and from 74 !

Some pics from a regularity rally I just entered. The funny wheel at the front is a spare from a 944.http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366108624.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366108643.jpg

m1sandman 04-16-2013 06:30 PM

Hey Ossiblue, do you have any idea what kind of adapter I need?

Pjr, I'm liking the cookie cutters, nice to see one mooooving!

ossiblue 04-17-2013 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7390349)
Hey Ossiblue, do you have any idea what kind of adapter I need?

Pjr, I'm liking the cookie cutters, nice to see one mooooving!

If you can post a pic of where the line to the wur connects to your FD, that would help my memory as I haven't had that set up for a long while. IIRC, you can remove the fitting that screws into the FD and holds the banjo fitting as well as the line to the wur and screw it into the outlet end of the gauge set--you may need an adapter for this. You will need a fitting that will connnect the inlet side of your gauge set to the outlet of the FD, where the combo fitting was removed. The line from the wur then connects back to the fitting you have screwed into the outlet of the gauge set.

m1sandman 04-17-2013 09:34 AM

Hey Ossiblue,
Yep, those are the adapters i need to figure out. Here's a picture of the top of my FD:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366220031.jpg

ossiblue 04-17-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7391418)
Hey Ossiblue,
Yep, those are the adapters i need to figure out. Here's a picture of the top of my FD:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366220031.jpg

Thanks for the pic.

(From the FD housing, outward) It looks like there is a lug that tightens the fitting into the FD housing, correct? Then, you see the banjo fitting, then a lug for an adapter to which the line to the wur is connected. The lug on the adapter appears to snug the banjo fitting in place. Is this correct?

Bottom line, the way the lines are assembled in the picture needs to be connected in the same way to the outlet side of the gauge set, and connect the inlet side of the gauge set directly to the FD housing. Once you disassemble the connections shown, you should be able to figure out what adapters or fittings you will need. It shouldn't be too complicated.

m1sandman 04-20-2013 11:50 AM

Ok, I pulled the banjo bolt off the top of the WUR and have confirmed that I need M8x1.0 adapters (male and female) to be able to test. I'm uploading a picture of my WUR per request from Tony as well.

Chris, if you are still on the thread, would love to see if you have those adapters in your test kit and if so, would you consider loaning it or helping me test it?

Thanks to all!
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366487385.jpg

boyt911sc 04-21-2013 05:57 AM

Need some clarification........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by m1sandman (Post 7397694)
Ok, I pulled the banjo bolt off the top of the WUR and have confirmed that I need M8x1.0 adapters (male and female) to be able to test. I'm uploading a picture of my WUR per request from Tony as well.

Chris, if you are still on the thread, would love to see if you have those adapters in your test kit and if so, would you consider loaning it or helping me test it?

Thanks to all!
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1366487385.jpg

sandman,

What are you trying to do? Check your fuel pressures with a fuel pressure gauge? Why do you need an adaptor (8 mm x 1.0)? This how I would do it:

1). Hook up the pressure gauge at either at the FD or WUR in series. Run the FP and with valve open.........you get the control fuel pressure reading. Please take note that this cold fuel pressure reading is directly controlled by the WUR and TPR (throttle pressure regulator with 3 settings). Select idle setting. This is how you check your control fuel pressure. This configuration is completely different from the CIS without the TPR (lever).

If you are getting a cold cold fuel pressure greater than the warm control pressure, there is flow restriction in the fuel return line/s. When the flow restriction is severe or totally blocked, the control fuel pressure would be greater than the system pressure.

2). For the system fuel pressure: You need to isolate the WUR and the TPR to get the pressure reading. Closing the valve to obtain the system pressure is correct for the later CIS engine without TPR.

Jim Sim's has a simple solution to this problem without using an adaptor (clever idea) by pinching close the return line from the TPR. The problem I find with this set-up even if it works is the inability to confirm or verify the fuel flow is completely stopped. A small leak is not that critical for this measurement.

Another method with I personally prefer is to remove the banjo fitting from the FD going to TPR. This would need an adaptor and plugged the banjo just in case there is fuel blockage at the return line. With the valve closed, both the WUR and TPR (disconnected) are isolated. No guessing!!!!

Tony

m1sandman 04-21-2013 06:42 AM

Hey Tony,
See my answers in line below. I'll call you later in the day if I get a chance, I appreciate that offer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by boyt911sc (Post 7398612)
sandman,

What are you trying to do? Check your fuel pressures with a fuel pressure gauge? Why do you need an adaptor (8 mm x 1.0)?

Based on what Ossiblue was saying above, I thought I needed to put my pressure gauge between the top of the FD and the fitting that goes to the WUR including the banjo bolt that goes to the TPR. I pulled that fitting and checked the size and thread pitch and it's an M8x1.0, which I don't have, so I figured I would need a female adapter for the WUR/TPR fitting to screw into and a male adapter to screw into the top of the FD.

Quote:

Originally Posted by boyt911sc (Post 7398612)
This how I would do it:

1). Hook up the pressure gauge at either at the FD or WUR in series. Run the FP and with valve open.........you get the control fuel pressure reading. Please take note that this cold fuel pressure reading is directly controlled by the WUR and TPR (throttle pressure regulator with 3 settings). Select idle setting. This is how you check your control fuel pressure. This configuration is completely different from the CIS without the TPR (lever).

If you are getting a cold cold fuel pressure greater than the warm control pressure, there is flow restriction in the fuel return line/s. When the flow restriction is severe or totally blocked, the control fuel pressure would be greater than the system pressure.

I have done this... its the only test I have successfully done (the cold control pressure at least) and measured 70psi, which as I understand is 20psi higher than what it should be. I have not gotten a warm control pressure -- which i think is what you wanted in post #11. I will attempt to provide that shortly.

As an aside, the factory spec I'm working from is based on a post by John Walker on rennlist here which specify 4.8-5.2 BAR, SYSTEM PRESS, AND 3.4-3.8 BAR, CONTROL PRESS. ROUGHLY 70-76#, AND 50-56# RESPECTIVELY, but I can dig through my brothers factory shop manual and track them down if you guys think we need more confirmation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by boyt911sc (Post 7398612)
2). For the system fuel pressure: You need to isolate the WUR and the TPR to get the pressure reading. Closing the valve to obtain the system pressure is correct for the later CIS engine without TPR.

Jim Sim's has a simple solution to this problem without using an adaptor (clever idea) by pinching close the return line from the TPR. The problem I find with this set-up even if it works is the inability to confirm or verify the fuel flow is completely stopped. A small leak is not that critical for this measurement.

Another method with I personally prefer is to remove the banjo fitting from the FD going to TPR. This would need an adaptor and plugged the banjo just in case there is fuel blockage at the return line. With the valve closed, both the WUR and TPR (disconnected) are isolated. No guessing!!!!

So in this description, it sounds like I don't need the M8x1.0 adapters to get the system pressure (if I'm understanding this correctly)... all I would need to do it pinch off the return line from the TPR and close the valve on the pressure tester (which is installed on the WUR side of the gauge), correct? that would isolate the FD as no fuel could then flow to the WUR or the TPR. Am I understanding it correctly?

Thanks for all your help!
Steve

m1sandman 04-21-2013 07:56 AM

OK, I have just run the tests as described below, 80 degrees ambient temp, cold engine (with the results):

Cold Control Pressure (tester between FD and WUR, valve open):
72 psi

Warm Control Pressure (same as above, power to WUR):
30 sec - 74psi
60 sec - 74psi
90 sec - 74psi
120 sec - 74psi


System Pressure (tester between FD and WUR, valve CLOSED, TPR return line pinched close):
78psi

Steve


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.