Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 28
What are the differences between LWB and SWB models?

Also are all 912's SWB?
Cheers

Old 02-03-2014, 10:14 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South of the line
Posts: 726
No I think 68 or 67 was the year it changed. The 912 was still available in 1969
__________________
SWB 2.2 lightweight. Runs and drives but can always be improved.
Old 02-04-2014, 01:40 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
B Programme cars were the first LWB cars and are 1969 Model Year.

The 912 was available as a B Programme car and hence late cars are LWB.

There is also the 1976 912E which was an I Programme car and was one year only - also LWB.

Apart from the obvious Wheelbase change the 1969 cars had the same basic hull but different front and rear fenders and turn signal lamps.

There are many detailed suspension control arm and front strut differences as well.
Old 02-04-2014, 01:55 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
pors1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: montreal quebec canada
Posts: 3,080
Garage
Chris-seven describe well 65-68 swb 69 and 1976E LWB .
Old 02-04-2014, 02:25 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 9,097
I guess this is a decent place to ask this question again. Is there a difference between SWB & LWB front fenders. The reason I ask is I had fenders to replace the rusted ones on my '69. When the driver side fender was bolted up, the rear of the wheel arch bowed out. It seemed the inside fender support that bolted up vertically to the body beneath the A pillar was too far back and caused the rear of the fender arch to bow outward. I had another fender that fit right which I had put on the car. Don't mean to slightly hijack this thread, but I've asked this a couple of times and read it asked a couple of times by others without any answers. The only thing I could think of was maybe the one I originally had installed was for a SWB car. And yes, the '69 912s were LWB like the 911s.
__________________
Marv Evans
'69 911E
Old 02-04-2014, 09:09 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
The fenders are different but should interchange if they are not damaged and out of shape.

There are several small differences.

The turn signal boxes and horn grille mountings differ between SWB and LWB and don't interchange. Very early SWB fenders had 4 hole Horn Grilles and later SWB cars had a 2 hole mounting both are different in size to the LWB part.

The fender flare is much more pronounced on the LWB fender compared to the SWB fender.

They should, however, interchange on a bodyshell as long as there has been no pervious damage.

Very early SWB Fenders were, however, fitted to individual bodyshells on the early production line (some imagination is needed to qualify this term).

Fenders were often significantly re-shaped by cutting and welding and then lead loading to suit a specific body as jigging was not always good in the early days.

The Fenders treated in this way were stamped in the headlamp bowl with the last 3 digits of the chassis number so they could be re-fitted to the correct shell after paint.

I would not be surprised that a fender from this generation of panel could be a dreadful fit on any bodyshell that it had not been modified to suit as it is possible that the A post was fitted poorly on early production bodies. It was easier to adjust the fender than the shell.

Early Doors, bonnets and engine lids were all treated in a similar manner and they can all be a pain to fit to another body.

By the start of the B Programme things were much better and panel fit had improved greatly but still nothing like modern standards and even new panels from Porsche Classic will need work.

Last edited by chris_seven; 02-04-2014 at 09:31 AM..
Old 02-04-2014, 09:27 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
RSS RSS is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_seven View Post
Fenders were often significantly re-shaped by cutting and welding and then lead loading to suit a specific body as jigging was not always good in the early days.

The Fenders treated in this way were stamped in the headlamp bowl with the last 3 digits of the chassis number so they could be re-fitted to the correct shell after paint.
Chris, interesting point you are making so let me see if I understand what your saying. I am restoring my 66' 911 right now and have stripped the paint off the original front fenders and headlight buckets. To my dismay, the 3 digits of the chassis are not stamped into the headlight buckets. I know these are the original fenders and headlight buckets. The last 3 digits are stamped into the doors but not the HB. Is this because my front fenders were not re-shaped to fit my car specifically?
Thanks.
Old 02-04-2014, 10:04 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North of the Bridge
Posts: 754
Remember that the '68 front fender is a one-year-only with very distinct differences from all the other long hood years. Well documented with a search. From '65-73 there are 4 distinct front fenders.
__________________
Free will is doing what we must joyfully.
Jung

'68 912 Coupe
'82 SC sunroof
Old 02-04-2014, 10:33 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
RSS RSS is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 158
I believe the only difference with the 68' is that the fender lip is cut away for the larger wheels/tires.
Old 02-04-2014, 10:44 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_seven View Post
The fender flare is much more pronounced on the LWB fender compared to the SWB fender.

They should, however, interchange on a bodyshell as long as there has been no pervious damage.
This may be a stupid question as I'm assuming it won't work, but will 1969 911 quarter panels fit on a 1966 912? I'm really wanting that more pronounced rear flare on my 912. Thanks in advance.
Old 07-23-2020, 07:16 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
djpateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burford, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,319
Since you will have to cut and weld your rear quarters, you can choose any flare you want back there; SC, ST, RS, RSR

__________________
Keeper of 356, 911, 912 & 914 databases; source for Kardex and CoA-type reports; email for info
Researching 356, 911, 912 & 914 Paint codes, Engine #'s and Transmission #'s
Addicted since 1975
Old 07-24-2020, 12:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.