![]() |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
PS - thanks for preparing yer sister so well! |
||
![]() |
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Great post.
Drove a 930 once and my raisens shrunk to the size of bb's.
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Forced Induction Junkie
|
"You're going to need a bigger boat."-Roy Scheider "Jaws"
Seriously, you're also going to have to update your brakes. You're doubling torque, you should double you're stopping power. The transmission mount is different than the 915. You'll have to search for one of those. Torsion bars, especially the rear, will have to be stiffened a bit. You are going to see a lot of squat when you get on it. We use to advise turbocharging a 911 is a more expensive proposition than buying a 930, but now that no longer holds true. Good luck....it should be a blast. P.S. 930 engines used dual fuel pumps- one by the fuel tank, the other by the rear axle.
__________________
Dave '85 930 Factory Special Wishes Flachbau Werk I Zuffenhausen 3.3l/330BHP Engine with Sonderwunsch Cams, FabSpeed Headers, Kokeln IC, Twin Plugged Electromotive Crankfire, Tial Wastegate(0.8 Bar), K27 Hybrid Turbo, Ruf Twin-tip Muffler, Fikse FM-5's 8&10x17, 8:41 R&P Last edited by WERK I; 03-03-2015 at 06:46 PM.. Reason: fuel pump edit |
||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
It doesn't have to be crazy expensive. Swapping the gearbox is starting to seem more complicated than the engine conversion.
As far as torsion bars I never really had problems with my suspension not being up to the task. Brakes are another matter. Last edited by quattrorunner; 03-03-2015 at 06:39 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
We have built just about every conceivable combination of turbo conversions over the years. The most fun combo has been the 77-86 915 with a billet side cover / 930 diff bearing , and a lightly built 3.3 (about 400 hp)
The car is a blast to drive on street, mountains, or track. BUT track use did bring up the limitations of the gear box. It just will not last with all that torque going through it. You can mitigate the problem slightly with adding a pump and cooler to lower the oil temps, use the best lubrication changing it often, REM treatment to reduce friction. BUT at the end of the day it is still limited. An interesting observation: At one time we had two identical 3.3 turbo powered cars in the shop; one was a four speed 930 box and the other a 5 speed 915. We just had to find out right? The 915 felt really quick, but guess what? The 4 speed matched the acceleration up to about 125 mph. No question that the 915 was more entertaining to drive, and in the twisties would be a definite advantage over the slow spool up with the 4 speed. So that is my two cents ;-)
__________________
1970 914-6 street"evil cockaroach" 1970 911 Targa "ST" Jade Green IROC Tribute (ready to race) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
|||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
Indeed!! That's great news.
That's great I've been waiting for someone that knew both. Cool info. I was expecting a slower car. Last edited by quattrorunner; 03-03-2015 at 07:14 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
What happened after 125?
__________________
Turbo powa! 1977 911s. it's cool |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
|||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
uhuh.......Sooooooo, what happened after 125?
__________________
Turbo powa! 1977 911s. it's cool |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
^^^ With the 930 gearbox, 125mph would be about 4-4.3K RPM in 4th gear = a VERY sweet spot for most turbochargers = WARP SPEED duuuuudddddeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Ronnie's.930; 03-03-2015 at 09:24 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Insert Tag Line HERE.....
|
I ran a mildly built C2Turbo engine (@350hp) with a bone stock 915 in my SC for 4-5 years with HARD track days in that mix. Never had an issue. The guy after me drove it hard for a few more years and the guy who owns it now floggs it routinely. Still going strong.
After I sold that car, I built a lightweight '72 with a 993 3.6 in it and it was very disappointing. I mean it was fast and quick and all of that, but it simply didn't hold a candle to the boost factor. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,571
|
Matt mentioned it already but the gearbox is too long and the axles won't work. Find a 75-77 930 trans and it will fit fine. Or, use a 915.
Funny that nobody here mentioned the second fuel pump. There are also the wiring differences, the oil system differences, the sway bar fitment issues (with the 930 trans), the tranny mount issues, etc. ... and if you use the 915 then you have clutch/flywheel issues to deal with. It's not a plug and play...but it can be done. We've done it many times and I'm in the middle of doing the conversion to my own car now ... 3.4L non-intercooled with a 915 in a 75 Carrera. Last edited by Mr9146; 03-03-2015 at 09:57 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MYR S.C.
Posts: 17,321
|
sell it and make a little $$$ and buy a 3.6
__________________
86 930 94kmiles [_ ![]() 88 BMW 325is 200K+ SOLD 03 BMW 330CI 220K:: [_ ![]() 01 suburban 330K:: [_ ![]() RACE CAR:: sold |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,233
|
|||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
All the smart people say two pumps. I'm running 1 044 pump. I'm sure I'll need another with raised boost.
|
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,682
|
okay then wouldnt it make financial sense to go to coil overs, ditch the torsion tube and install the 930 trans? selling the 915 should pay for some or most of the coil over costs right?
|
||
![]() |
|