![]() |
Quote:
That's what they want you to believe!!! |
Quote:
You have a photographic memory except you ran out of film. I hear your wife really likes it when you say something nice about her tooth. |
Quote:
Whereas before I suggested that people research all the options, I will now actively warn people away from your products. Maybe this will cause you to think before you post. |
Quote:
Also I did many more things to my cab... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129055.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129195.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129218.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129250.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129285.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129309.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129339.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129419.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129456.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1462129486.jpg |
Quote:
Honestly, if it wasn't for the fact that Gilles/Zippy has some of Reid's products in his possession, I would be convinced that Reid has never even laid hands on a 911 a/c system, and that his many years of posting garbage on the subject here is just a sham meant to entertain himself. |
Quote:
|
G thanks for the rescue!
|
now that you have bared yourself
perhaps you start a new thread for what we are doing? |
Quote:
|
thanks for being a very nice gentleman ! you are right
but not seeing it all Quote:
|
time to make a new thread
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Actually I have been following this thread (for a year now) waiting to hear how this system works. The primary condenser is smaller than the secondary with presumably less airflow, there must be 4 lines running from the engine bay to the front instead of two normally present. Will it need another 1/2 lb of 134a to charge also? Lots of promises and teasing but no posted results yet. The PF condensers do look pretty slick, but is rerouting (reversing) the flow actually advantageous?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My car came with an underbelly condenser and it was run, by design, as the first condenser. So, it was "reversing the gas" long before Kellogg Cereal showed up...but putting the tiny front condenser first, hoping it would do anything? Silly. |
Quote:
fyi the whole a/c system with these PFCs will probably require approximately between .95 lbs to 1 lbs .10 oz -to- 1 lbs .20 ozs of R134A refrigerant for optimum amount gestiment from my experience installing these particulate version PFCs when reversing the gases, however CABRIOLETS have cloth tops compared to hardtops and this is the first Cab I have had any version of my PFC designs installed into and expect the cockpit to be warmer then my other installations do to the Cab cloth top air leaks, that is why I am digital controlling the evaporator to run within only one degree increments precisely controllable above freezing to compensate colder note r134a has a very small/tight window of optimum amount to SYSTEM efficiency, closest to the least amount possible to obtain the coldest temperature; this is why with 134a your vent temps get coldest just before they need refrigerate added with an extremely slow leak over time than quickly turn warm for your other very excellent questions you will haft to wait until G starts a new thread, I am done with this thread and abuse G has unlimited support from me day or night 24/7 |
Quote:
And anther silly aspect of the whole deal is Kellog's oft-repeated claim that his gear and system renders all existing a/c componentry woefully inadequate and obsolete, while offering supporting vent temp evidence that shows performance which is maybe equal too, and definitely inferior than (depending on the particular, "antiquated" components used and the skill level of the person doing the installation and system charging), systems built with the proven aftermarket items that Kellog so forcefully maligns. So where are the benefits; a little bit less component weight? Maybe each condenser weighs a little less, but how much does the extra hose required to "reverse the methane" weigh? It's one thing to post "I have designed a/c alternatives that perform almost the same but might weigh less than what's already available" and another to say that one's new stuff blows everything else out of the water and then provide evidence to the contrary. Talk about "exposing" one's rear end! |
Not to hijack this thread but I rebuilt my pedal cluster and waxed my car this weekend!
|
Quote:
|
I can't help myself...
Post 216 has enlightened me to the real purpose of this system; it's clearly stated this is being installed in a cabaret, nullifying the opinions of every air cooled 911 a/c "expert" in this thread (barring those whose career is installing HVAC in cabarets of course [Rawknees probably falls into that category, just sayin']). |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website