![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
HP Junkies Offcial 1/4 Mile Results.
Well many of you have ask, Not some to be proud of but what the heck...........
![]() R/T............. .606 60'............. 2.426 330........... .6.237 1/8.............. 9.076 MPH............ .92.44 1000............ 11.410 1/4............... 13.32 MPH...............121.44 Oh well there you have it.......... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
10.76@139-1/4 mile 0-1 mile 193MPH I Love to Shine Cars ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
I know you've put a LOT of time and $$$ into the car, so you have your expectations.
Nonetheless, that 121 mph speed at the 1/4 mi. mark is pretty big. Your car has to be pulling pretty hard to hit 121 at the 1/4!!!!!
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
KTL,
Nonetheless, that 121 mph speed at the 1/4 mi. mark is pretty big. Your car has to be pulling pretty hard to hit 121 at the 1/4!!!!! Yes, thats what my friends were saying last nite,it feel good but from a roll feels Real Good ![]()
__________________
10.76@139-1/4 mile 0-1 mile 193MPH I Love to Shine Cars ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 281
|
121 is a very impressive closing speed. i had a 1971 camaro that i tricked out and it ran mid 13's with a finishing speed around 113 mph...all of low end torque.
good job juan.
__________________
1987 Carrera Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 276
|
MAN I AM WITH YOU JUAN, I WOULD THINK THAT SHE WOULD BE IN THE 10 OR 11 MARK WITH THAT KINDA POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO... HUH.... NONE THE LESS A HELL OF A SPEED IN THE QTR.. I WOULD STILL THINK THAT WOULD BE A FASTER TIME .
__________________
I'll take a liter of Cola. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 251
|
Your time is not that bad, the problem is your 60' time which should be 1.6-1.3, and your reaction time should be .200. I guessing that you are intially spining your wheels. 1/4 miling is an art, you need to reduce your tire pressure, and work on the lanch. With a terminal speed of 121 you should be in the 11's easily with a little practice.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
We also weight her contrary of what I was told she is a wopping 2875 pnds full of fuel.
All the 911s that Im aware that run 10s they are 700hp+. Maybe just maybe with a perfect launch we could be on the 12s but maybes don't count. ![]()
__________________
10.76@139-1/4 mile 0-1 mile 193MPH I Love to Shine Cars ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I wouldn't be at all disappointed! After all, when you come upon a corner at that speed your car has the capability to handle it. 121 in 1/4 is awfully impressive even if the time doesn't necessarily reflect it. I'd focus on a road course next. Should be gobs of fun!
__________________
2009 997.2 C2S |
||
![]() |
|
Team California
|
Yeah, You should take it on a real track, (one with turns), and post some numbers. Should be impressive; Porsches have never been the best drag racing cars, heck, you can spend half the $$ and go twice as fast in something else.
![]()
__________________
Denis Statement from Tylenol: "Nice try. Release the Epstein files." ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Very impressive in the overall speed. I used to run a CB1100F in the high 10's with top speed only a little bit slower. I bet if the timeing was in a half mile, you would be very presently surprised.
__________________
.. |
||
![]() |
|
fancytown
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DEE-troit
Posts: 1,726
|
Juan--like the fellas said, you can stick a turn at the end of your run. Not many people can say that. You have a very impressive car.
a bit different, but still impressive is this Fleetwood that can run low 13's on whitewalls: Turbo Fleetwood It may be fast, but your car is in a whole different league.
__________________
all cars sold. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,396
|
Next stop - BONNEVILLE!
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Guys,
My car is NOT a ROAD RACING CAR is a STREET DRAG CAR simple, made for it or not, thats what it is SORRY ........................ so PLEASE lets get over it. James Adams, Belive it or not that is in the agenda not today or tomorrow but it will happen ![]()
__________________
10.76@139-1/4 mile 0-1 mile 193MPH I Love to Shine Cars ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: St. Louis Missouri
Posts: 1,454
|
(cue George of SwampMonster fame)
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
WOW?!?!? Nice reaction to some people having an interest in what you have to say. Most of us have an appreciation for how these cars can handle, that's all. I don't know about others knowing that you wanted a devoted drag car, I know I didn't. Didn't mean to open a can of worms . . .
I'm taking my football and going home! Hah! Not. Just kidding!!! ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
2009 997.2 C2S |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,960
|
Quote:
Post more details about your technique and setup, maybe Curt and our other drag veterans will offer some pointers. Good luck
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
masraum,
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!Thats WHAT I need people to help me and accept it as it, Thank you very much for offering your help ! The launch of course is the # 1 problem,me been very conservative I got out of the hole at 2,500rpms and of course no boost yet all motor. We have 0 Wheel spining or traction problems we video it last nite and is just amaizing ,I belive the # 1 issue is the launch with a better one we could do much better. Axles we will replace soon just to be safe. Gear Box will see how good this G-50 is if it breaks maybe a G-50/50 ? unless I get better advise. Tires I agree we will install some slicks (DOT) This sway bar sugestion Im very interested in if you could tell me in details what I must do. If I can start removing weight that may help but I still my a/c, and the other goddies ![]() ANYONE that wants to help in a POSITIVE way please do. ![]()
__________________
10.76@139-1/4 mile 0-1 mile 193MPH I Love to Shine Cars ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Juan,
I'm starting to worry, you must want my HP junkie crown! My last time slip was 12:22 at 124mph. The talk about Porsche not being a drag racer, is true. I was'nt trying to build a drag car, just wanted a fast car. I'm sure the same is true for you. If you have a fast car some times you hav't to prove it. So for you na-sayers, we are "HP Junkies" not "drag racers". By the way I got beat by a Ferrari F-40 at the" Foreign wars" last year. It was'nt a drag racer either. Have fun Juan.
__________________
"Never go faster than you can stop" 85 - 930 (750hp) Norwood motec 3.5 twin turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,960
|
I have been told by a 911 racer here in Houston that the G50 should be bulletproof. He told me that they never have problems with high horse race cars with slicks unless they are really abused.
Disconnect the ends of the front swaybar from the control arms in the front, that should give you a little more vertical travel in the front suspension. Of course right now since you aren't getting any wheelspin that's not really an issue. The main point behind that is to get more traction. You could always remove the front sway bar which would remove weight and give you more travel. I'm not sure how the torsion bar front suspension will work for drag racing since I doubt you'll get the kind of travel that you would in a normally sprung front end, but again, you need to get to the point where traction is a problem first. At this point the launch is the biggest thing to work on.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Quote:
It was thought up aways back to have a turbo'd motor that can achieve boost at even zero engine rpm. It essentially consists of integrating a compressor side bypass, plumbed to the turbine side. (inserted pause for WTF? ) . .the trick is there is a gas fed flame tube in between. (your turbo is now essentially a simple turbine engine) This, in effect, decouples the boost as a function of piston speed, and produces boost where you seem to need it. Ofcourse, it's not very fuel efficient ![]()
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|