![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: costa mesa so. ca
Posts: 186
|
![]()
what do you think my engine will put out in HP? its going on a dyno soon and i just want to get some guesses. it has 2.2L T p/c's and a 2.4 crank. T cams. zeniths. bursch headers and steelpak exhaust, and crank ignition. i think it will be in the 150 or 155 range. it started with 125 and th crank should (so i've heard)add 25 HP with the 2.2L p/c's
Last edited by 911tmaster; 11-13-2002 at 03:31 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
It is like a (slightly) higher compression 2.4T and I'm guessing slightly more than the 2.4T's 140. To be more precise, I'm guessing 125-130hp at the wheels.
I'm guessing it might crack 150hp (130hp @ wheels) if there was really good attention to detail. Ooops, just remembered the 2.4T had MFI which seems to be good for 10hp. Knock back my estimate by ~10hp. I think 120hp at the wheels. But a nice smooth torqey motor.
__________________
1975 911S (in bits) 1969 911T (goes, but need fettling) 1973 BMW 2002tii (in bits, now with turbo) Last edited by CamB; 11-13-2002 at 04:13 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,569
|
Can I change my vote? I only saw the poll, not the thread...at the factory rating for my car, I voted...sorry if I messed up the %ages...I'd guess around 120-130...
|
||
![]() |
|
Navin Johnson
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wantagh, NY
Posts: 8,811
|
based on what info you are giving, I wouldnt guess more than the stock 2.2T, the Zeniths are restrictive, the bursh steelpack is a dinosaur.
The stroke of the 2.2 and the 2.4 is the same..never heard of a crank adding hp ( perhaps reducing losses though) Unless you did some head work, you have a stock 2.2T with crank fire and non factory exhaust....... Id say 135 if your lucky
__________________
Don't feed the trolls. Don't quote the trolls ![]() http://www.southshoreperformanceny.com '69 911 GT-5 '75 914 GT-3 and others |
||
![]() |
|
Warren Hall Student
|
The 2.2 has a stroke of 66mm. The 2.4 has a stroke of 70.4mm. This is the displacement difference of the two motors.
I'll guess 135HP Bobby |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: costa mesa so. ca
Posts: 186
|
hmm....i need to get some webers!what else can i do to up the hp?
|
||
![]() |
|
Warren Hall Student
|
I don't think Webers are really going to gain anything over the Zenith's. They're both 40mm carbs. Even adding a sport exhaust would probably give very little gain because your intake ports are 29mm. Outside of porting, more aggressive cams, or a displacement increase I don't see alot of area for improvement.
E cams might be a way to go but you might have to cut reliefs in the pistons. A 2.4E is 165HP if my memory serves. With carbs you would probably get around 155 to 160HP. Bobby |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
My 2.4T with L cams and 40 mm PMOs recently pulled 133hp at the wheel at roughly 6,400/6,600 rpm (rpm from memory).
I'm guessing you'll pull about the same. As CamB said: it is a smooth and torqey motor
__________________
...Oliver '73 911T: 2.9ltr w/ PMO EFI |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: costa mesa so. ca
Posts: 186
|
who are the guys thinking i'll get over 170 hp? woah 170+ would be great!
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
Email me about 911 exhaust stud repair tools, rsr911@neo.rr.com 1966 912 converted to 3.0 and IROC body SOLD unfortunately ![]() 1986 Ford F350 Crew Cab 7.3 IDI diesel, Banks Sidewinder turbo, ZF5 5spd, 4WD Dana 60 king pin front, DRW, pintle hook and receiver hitch, all steel flat bed with gooseneck hidden hitch. Awesome towing capacity! |
||
![]() |
|