|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Hope, PA
Posts: 338
|
74S rear ride height after 3.2 swap
I guess the 3.2 weighs a bit more than the stock 2.7. As you can see the rear is a tad squatted due to the additional weight of the 3.2. Also, to be fair, the fuel tank is EMPTY, and I mean zero fuel so that will certainly bring the nose down a bit before adjusting. This should be fun. I am letting a qualified shop do this work as math is not my strong suit.
__________________
2013 Speed Yellow 991 Cab 1974 Silver 911S Targa 3.2 1997 993 Cabriolet 1958 356A Sunroof Coupe 2002 Rover P38 Borrego |
||
04-24-2016, 03:33 AM
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Just drop the front and it will look great!
__________________
82 911 SC |
||
|
04-24-2016, 03:34 AM
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Hope, PA
Posts: 338
|
Who knows, once the tank has fuel in it (there is zero now), it may look correct.
__________________
2013 Speed Yellow 991 Cab 1974 Silver 911S Targa 3.2 1997 993 Cabriolet 1958 356A Sunroof Coupe 2002 Rover P38 Borrego |
||
|
04-24-2016, 03:58 AM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 3,591
|
You'll probably need to move to a bigger rear torsion bar to carry the weight. If you are at stock, the factory went to a 25 rear bar.
__________________
1973 911S (since new) RS MFI specs 1991 C2 Turbo |
||
|
04-24-2016, 10:08 AM
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
1982 Porsche 911sc
