![]() |
Quote:
I have not had any problem with the zerk fittings so far (2 weeks or so), but the roads around here are most smooth. The zerks are definitely one of the lowest points on the car, but since they sit between the rear wheels, it would take a pretty nasty bump between the rear wheels to hit the zerk fittings. Entering or exiting a steep driveway wouldn't do it. There are other maneuvers that might, though. Zeusdog http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1520837551.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1520837551.jpg |
Quote:
|
Are these the same parts? No specs provided by Pelican and they are very red. Part #: EIB-E40-72-015-01-11
|
Quote:
Does your front sway have two for 3 adjustments? The description on Eibach's website says "Front Sway Bar is Solid and 3 Way-Adjustable." That seems to conflict with everything on this thread. Thanks for the great writeups! |
Quote:
here ya go /swayaway.com/tech-room/torsion-bar-wheel-rate-calculator/ |
I installed these on my 85 Autocross car and I'm really pleased with them. Not going to bother re-hashing the install (they install like sway bars, and they fit really well!) But do have a few pics:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152459.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152459.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152459.jpg I'm what cyclists refer to as a "weight weenie" so habitually weigh everything I take off or replace on the car.... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152802.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152802.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152802.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542152802.jpg I can't say that I've fully put these through the paces yet in terms of expolring their adjustability. Since I had fresh rear tires, but old, hard, fronts (long story) for my final event of the season the car was understeering at the limit but I chose to play it safe and kept both bars at the middle setting. What I can say for sure is the car reacted FAR better/faster than before, particularly in transitions. I'm running 21mm front and 28mm rear torsions in a 2350 pound car, which is fairly soft by most standards, but the roads (and empty parking lots!) around here a absolute S%^&%$# by any standard. So with this soft setup I was previously getting quite a bit of body roll. With the new bars,both the turn-in and side to side transitions were quicker and more precise than ever before. Honestly it was like having a quick steering rack compared to before. The improvement was that obvious. Speed in Autocross is all about creating the largest radius arcs, through the course, as possible. The new bars shortened the length of time spent wallowing along in a straight line between the arcs so I was able to navigate the course with much less steering input. Another way to think about it is that I was able to keep the tires working more of the time, instead of waiting for the body to roll over and (finally!) take a set. In closing , I would say these bars perfectly suit a car with streetable torsion bars which may not have enough spring rate (and the associated low speed dampening) to adequately control body roll. Thanks to Ryan and Eibach for bringing these to market! |
Forgot
The action shot!!
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1542154274.jpg Note the suspension travel on the car - it might appear to be bottoming in front but I raised my spindles 40mm and shortened the bumpstop and added strut-shortening seal holders. |
PS - front setting
Last post on the topic, I promise!
I've noted a few posters have mentioned it looks to be difficult to adjust the front bar to the softest setting. I'd have to agree that it's probably not the ideal setting due to the angularity of the links. In fact the links are short enough that the efficacy of the adjustment using that 3rd hole is probably a bit limited, due to the inescapable limits of the geometry involved. Not the fault of the design, just a result of the confines they were working in. Overall they did a pretty good job coming up with a fully bolt on solution that fits and works. However, I had a good look at my mine and I think lengthening the front links by threading the rod ends apart (while still leaving adequate threads engaged) would allow one to select the frontmost adjustment hole without binding. |
Looking good. Cool that you have 1,320 posts.:D
FWIW, I think you will find that you may want to put the rear on the softest, then fine tune the front to get the best balance. At least that is how my setup worked best. edit: well it was 1320. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also: What is the diameter of the rear bar? I see that the front is 24mm. Thank you, |
Quote:
|
great post - thanks all.
I did my rear last couple nights (3 hrs) and am planning on fronts this weekend. I am going middle setting on each. Have done new Bilstein Sports shocks and Turbo tie rods thus far. There is a local shop that does race car set-up etc. I might just get them to do front as it needs aligment anyway and they can help with setting. If so, I'll post their recs. New paint as soon as this gets completed!!!! |
Quote:
|
Cool!
Thanks Ryan and Acme911 |
Bringing this thread back up.
Just picked up a set from our host. My question is while I have it up on stands are there any other things I should do while I am doing this project? Or things you wish you had done yourself? Thanks Tim |
Avoiding "Preload" of new F/R bars
If we assume the car is currently "balanced" or currently properly corner-weighted, before the new bars are installed, it is important to adjust the drop link lengts with a "suitable" sand bag in the drivers seat, correct tire pressure, one half tank of gas and to do the link installation on a FLAT surface, or, reset the corner weights, just to be sure and reattach the drop links as above.
I do not have enough experience with swapping bars, while the car is on stands or on a lift to suggest a more accurate way to get a good result. Chris |
Possible extension of range of adjustment/reducing-eliminating binding
Quote:
I presume that anti roll bars and links are more effective/linear/predictable and longer lasting when operating at the most favorable angles, I.e. 90 degrees. I also realize that adjustability goes either side of this ideal- but, it is something to try to adjust toward. Chris |
I've added the Eibach sways to my 81 SC and I'm on the fence if it was a good idea.
I started on the stiffest setting front and rear, and felt like I was about to die going into corners. WAY too tail happy for my liking. Also made me realize how well my car was setup with OG bars (Shoutout Sublime Silverlake). I then moved the rear to the softest setting and kept the front stiff. This was a huge improvement over the previous settings but still felt less confident than my stock setup in the twisties. Latest settings are both front and rear set to the softest setting and I'm finally feeling somewhat back to par. Understeer was relatively predicatble and no terrifying oversteer characterisitics. My last test will be moving front to the mid setting and keeping rear the softest. Will report back soon but as of now.... I have a bit of buyers remorse as I could HAUL ASS in my stock setup and these new sways are making me question each turn rather than feel confident. Bit of a bummer but maybe mid setting is the sweet spot. 81 911 Targa 7s & 9s - 16s |
What T-bars and shocks do you use? If you go to stiffer sway bars, you need stiffer T-bars and shocks too, etc., etc.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website