|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 128
|
I cant pass emissions. Is this due to the act that the car has FI and the PO did not change cams? Is there a wasy to pass emissions with this setup?
Thanks VIPRKLR 77 911 S 71 914 1.7L Rust Rocket [This message has been edited by VIPRKLR (edited 04-30-2001).] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Pardon my ignorance, but exactly what state are you in that checks emissions on a 30plus-year-old car?
The 1.7L engine comes standard with FI; what exactly are you talking about " ... the PO did not change cams?" |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aircooled Heaven
Posts: 1,054
|
The FI cam should pass with carbs, they usually run super clean...Try running super unleaded, and driving it really hard before you have it tested..
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 128
|
Rouser: no problem my friend. I live in Colorado. I only need to pass emissions one time (if I sell it, then it will be required to pass again, and so on...)
Since the car came with Fuel Injection (FI) it had cams designed for FI. I was under the impression that if you change the induction system, you need to change cams as well, but apparently I was wrong. ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ON, Canada
Posts: 886
|
IIRC, you must change to a carb cam if switching to carbs from the stock FI if you wish to enjoy improved performance. (nothing to do with emissions per se) This is why most feel that the stock FI is the best induction system in an otherwise stock engine.
[This message has been edited by DDS (edited 04-30-2001).] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: idaho springs, co
Posts: 132
|
I, too live in Colorado and have had to deal with this. The biggest culprit that I have found in getting aircooled motors to pass emmisions is valve adjustment. They must be absolutely at .006. I had #3 just a hair loose on the intake and exhaust and failed at 1300 ppm, I did the valves and went through at 450ppm. Also make sure that the timing is right. At our altitude you can get away with 32 degrees at 3500rpm without running too hot. Good luck.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 31
|
I too am thinking of putting dual 40's on my '75 1.8. I'm not going to change the cam right now. I live in Texas so emissions won't be an issue. How does the car run with stock cam. I would have e-mailed but you didn't put address. Anyone else with input would be greatly appreciated.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
------------------ Sweet Blue 72' 914 Check it out at http://www.geocities.com/eat_um_up/914.html |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 362
|
[preface: sorry for the long post...]
Milwaukee (that’s in WI ) and the 6 surrounding counties still require emission checks for cars back to 1968.You’ll find, generally speaking, swapping FI for carbs without swapping out the cam will give you poor idle and poor emissions. Frankly I’m quite surprised that with 30 years of testimonies on the subject the results aren’t more clear-cut. I can attest to those claims first hand. After an engine fire I did that swap on a ’71 1.7L with dual Dellortos, and they never ran right. After the fact I came to find out the problem was likely the cam -- designed specifically for F.I. I might add. BTW: This is the same claim George H. from AA touts. Regardless of what you think of AA, you have to admit George knows what he’s talking about. Further, a buddy with a ’73 1.7L is in the same predicament as you; can’t pass emissions after the PO did the carb swap without swapping the cam -- even after having the “the pro’s” (whatever that means) tune the car before testing. His car was still putting out so many hydrocarbons the cars in the adjacent testing bays were failing! The guys spent 45min. with him trying all sorts of different things to try and get it to pass, but to no avail. I’d tend to believe having the valves adjusted correctly would help get the engine closer to that pass mark, but I heard (maybe just a urban legend) running super unleaded and getting the engine warm won’t matter much on Type-IV’s. I think it was here actually that someone argued the virtues of running lower octane fuels since the higher octane fuel additives do little for emissions, power, etc. I’ve also heard leaning out the injection on Type-IV’s won’t help because while you’ll pass one test on one end of the scale you’ll fail some other test on the other end. The trick is to be right in the middle so both tests will pass. My buddies solution was to get a PO box in another county that wouldn’t require testing. I’d be really interested in knowing what you come up with so I can pass on a real solution (short of swapping out the carb). Tim |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I am also in CO. My 2.0 with euro p/c's, the "appropriate" cam and dual 44's passed easily. Get a good tune up (including valve adj), put in good gas (probably more expensive than the tune up!)drive it hard, double check the tune and give it a shot. Steve's emissions (east of Kipling on 44th in Wheatridge) did a great job on mine. Then go get classic plates and call it a day!
Scott S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 362
|
Actually, in WI where I live checking 1968 and later cars IS for classic plates.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Here in AZ, I can tell you from personal experience that with my 1970 914 w/73 2.0L engine, I can easily pass emissions with a standard FI setup. Even when I had the system totally screwed up and running rich, I could still pass by cranking the ECU knob to full lean and opening the air bleed screw to get the proper idle rpm. Brad Anders |
||
|
|
|
|