 
					|   | 
 | 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2007 
					Posts: 6
				 | 
				
				951 trouble passing emissions!
			 
			Just got back from a smog test here in CA, and my 87' 944 turbo failed fairly miserably. A few details on the car: 90k miles, 8k miles on a freshly rebuilt engine from Lindsey Racing, cored cat, just ran some seafoam through the tank and vac lines.  Test results @15MPH HC 115 (81 max) CO 0.81 (0.52 max) NO 2269 (689 max) 02 0.78% @20MPH HC 103 (63 max) CO 0.61 (0.43 max) NO 2078 (730 max) 02 0.63% I realize the cored cat is likely a big contributor to the problem, but I've heard these cars can pass w/o cats. Anyone know if these numbers are indicative of a particular problem (plugs/ 02 sensor / etc), or any advice on e-test tips and tricks? Thanks- | ||
|  07-11-2010, 02:42 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Dec 2006 
					Posts: 325
				 | 
			You cannot pass Calif. emissions without a CAT.  You need the CAT to pass NO, since the limits were lowered in 2010.
		 | ||
|  07-11-2010, 02:48 PM | 
 | 
| winter-hater club member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: salt lake city, utah 
					Posts: 24,705
				 | 
			cat and a bad O2 sensor, perhaps, vacuum leaks.
		 
				__________________ 2000 Corvette - ????, 2007 Buell XB9R - Astrid, 1996 Discovery - Piglet, 2000 Forester "COOL PRIUS!" - Nobody Ever | ||
|  07-12-2010, 06:55 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In a dumpster behind Albertson's in Los Angeles County 
					Posts: 2,132
				 | 
			Replace your cat, your HC numbers are unburned HydroCarbons, NO is carbon monoxide, and the NOX numbers are Oxides of Nitrogen, all are what the cat is supposed to neutralize.  May as well replace the O2 sensor while your at it, as the "somewhat" established industry figure for their life is about 60,000.
		 
				__________________ 1989 944 NA Glacier Blue - SOLD IT 1989 944 S2 Alpine White T-Boned (totaled) by a lady dressed in a CLOWN costume (RIP  ) Apr 89 - Mar 08 1988 944 Turbo S Silver Rose Metallic, K27/6, Vitesse MAF, Tial 38mm DP WG Semper Fi Last edited by 89-944NA; 07-13-2010 at 08:38 AM.. | ||
|  07-13-2010, 08:23 AM | 
 | 
| Rogue Tuning Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Denver 
					Posts: 448
				 | 
			We've been able to pass Colorado emissions without a cat... Your HC are not too far off, CO2 is just a function of HC. But your NOx definitely needs some work. To pass, you are going to need to pull timing and fuel... Not sure what your using to tune. And even then - I had to make a emissions-only chip to get a reasonably stock car (without cat) to pass. -Rogue 
				__________________ -Joshua www.RogueTuning.com Last edited by Rogue_Ant; 07-14-2010 at 01:10 AM.. | ||
|  07-14-2010, 12:25 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2007 
					Posts: 6
				 | 
			Thanks for the advice, all. I'm actually having a new cat (magnaflow 36106) installed as we speak. Hopefully that will be the magic ticket, although I'm slightly skeptical that we'll get all three metrics under the CA standards with just a cat. I'll do a quick check over for vac leaks as well -- all the hoses are brand new, are there any components that tend to leak that are attached to the vac lines that I should check particularly thoroughly?  I'll post results when I head in for a re-test... | ||
|  07-16-2010, 07:39 AM | 
 | 
|   | 
| In the Fires of Hell..... | 
			The Idle Control Valve (ICV) has been known to leak. It is located underneath the intake manifold. Good luck, Keith 
				__________________ PCA Instructor: '88 951S - with LBE, Guru chips, 3Bar FPR, 1.3mm shimmed WG, 3120 lbs, 256 RWHP, 15 psig boost | ||
|  07-16-2010, 07:56 AM | 
 | 
| winter-hater club member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: salt lake city, utah 
					Posts: 24,705
				 | 
			huh.  that's cool.  are they going to be installing the magnaflow cat on a stock exhaust?  cost? Quote: 
 
				__________________ 2000 Corvette - ????, 2007 Buell XB9R - Astrid, 1996 Discovery - Piglet, 2000 Forester "COOL PRIUS!" - Nobody Ever | ||
|  07-16-2010, 07:19 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2007 
					Posts: 6
				 | 
			Finally got around to re-testing the car! Good news: the HCs and COs are extremely low, but the NOx are still high. I passed the 15mph rolling test on all metrics, but the 25mph exceeded the NO limit (1010ppm / 730ppm MAX).  I'm thinking my next best bet is a new O2 sensor? From the numbers, it appears as though the engine is running a little hot (lean). Thoughts? Thanks! | ||
|  08-04-2010, 07:36 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2007 
					Posts: 6
				 | |||
|  08-04-2010, 07:38 AM | 
 | 
| Going faster all the time | 
			I had great success with running just a gallon of E85 at the refill light (so you still have about 2 gallons left) to get the NO low. Now if I could just get mine to go the other way (lean).... I am still over on HC and now CO. I had a new Walker cat put in. But that failed worse than the stock cat (surprise). I have an actual mechanic (not me) looking it over now and seeing if it is an injector/compression thing that is causing it to not make it. Best of luck to you. Last edited by Litesonic; 08-04-2010 at 10:18 AM.. Reason: my smog woes | ||
|  08-04-2010, 10:16 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: SF East Bay 
					Posts: 1,856
				 | Quote: 
 What are your numbers compared to the previous test? I've been able to reduce NOx a lot by dialing back the ignition a little. Although I'm still leary of the new cat because the last time I swapped in a cat for a straight-pipe, all three numbers were reduced significantly. Last edited by DannoXYZ; 08-05-2010 at 04:29 PM.. | ||
|  08-05-2010, 04:27 PM | 
 |