![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
|
Chip for 1996 993
I'm told that the ECU in the 1996 993's cannot be reprogrammed or upgraded. I've been advised that I need to get a 1997-1998 chip and then (and only then) that new chip can be reprogrammed. Does anybody know where I can get a 1997 to 1998 ECU and how much it will cost? In addition, a company called Powerchip (I've used them on my M5 with good results) claims to be able to reprogram a 1996 99 ECU. Does anybody have any thoughts or comments regarding the Powerchip claims or on they would go about upgrading a 1996 ECU? Thanks
Mark in VA |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
Skip it and go to Rennsportsystems and Steve Weiner - he built a GREAT chip for my '97 - talk about throttle response!!!
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 253
|
Steve also gets 97 ECU's from time to time.
|
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
There are some that do a piggy back system that merely interrupts the DME output. I agree call Steve for excelllent advice in this matter.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ridgecrest/Mammoth
Posts: 27
|
This is my own humble opinion but I dont think chips for worth the expense for NA cars. Remember brain is scrambled by two hair blowers,
and .8bar of boost. There are other things you can do to make you faster. Suspension being the 1st thing. Better brakes all kinds of things better than a new 97 ECU THEN the reprogramming costs. Turbos get 40-80 and on up in reprogramming and thats worth it. But man look at the whole picture before going to that mod. When we do runs some of the NA cars are hard to keep up in the twisties becasue the other drivers have spent money on 1. suspension 2. Driving classes I would go there first before a 15-30 hp gain on a NA chip. But thats my forced air opinion
__________________
Old Guy 04 GT3 Manthey power kit |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
|
Old Guy - Nice to see ya here
![]() ![]()
__________________
NEVER LIFT |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
What I like best about the Steve Weiner 'chip' in my 1997 engine brain.....the throttle response! It is unbelievable!
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
|
I've spoken to Steve about doing this to my '96 C2, and it sounds promising. However my only reservation is with the long-term reliability and what adverse affects it might have on the motor. Has anyone had any experience with this or heard anything that might lead you to believe the extra hp will reduce the life of the motor ?
__________________
NEVER LIFT |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
You MUST use a 50/50 mix of 92/100 unleaded at the track - timing has been changed and youneed the insurance of higher octane when running hard for longer periods.
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
|
Craig - Interesting, cause Steve said nothing to me about needing to use higher octane. I'm already at a disadvantage too being in CA we can only get 91 octane
![]()
__________________
NEVER LIFT |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
Well, here is what Steve told me:
Our WA State 92 is fine for street driving with the chip flash he did - & I specifically asked about hard street driving (which I do a TON of) and he said drive away, will be no problems. He did say to use that 50/50 mix for track use. I could not be happier with it - the throttle response is HUGE. Did I say I liked it? ;-)
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ridgecrest/Mammoth
Posts: 27
|
Agro you gonna be a buttonwillow??
__________________
Old Guy 04 GT3 Manthey power kit |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
|
OG - Wish I could, but I'm not gonna be able to make it. When's the next event at Willow Springs ?
__________________
NEVER LIFT |
||
![]() |
|