|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 413
|
3.2 vs 3.6 [996] Air Conditioning?
My early '89 Carrera is in the shop getting a '97 3.6 engine installed. Should I keep the air conditioning on the new motor, or throw it away? I'll keep it if it performs better than the compressor on the 3.2........
Thanks, Drums
__________________
'89 G50 w/ 3.6 V-Ram-now Ca. legal! FORMER Yosemite Chapter PCA V. P. |
||
04-16-2005, 09:15 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Viera FL
Posts: 5,642
|
The compressor is about the same. The difference between the two is the plumbing and condensors - the ones for a 993 (1997) is much more efficient.
You may see a little improvement with the 993 compressor. AFJuvat
__________________
Es geht nicht darum wie schnell man faehrt, sondern wie gut man schnell fahren kann. Ihr Brunnen der nutzlosen Porsche Information |
||
|
04-19-2005, 07:47 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 413
|
Thanks for the response. The wrench who is putting the engine in gave me the bad news. It looks like the junk pile for the air conditioning....
Drums
__________________
'89 G50 w/ 3.6 V-Ram-now Ca. legal! FORMER Yosemite Chapter PCA V. P. |
||
|
04-20-2005, 04:25 AM
|
|
![3.2 vs 3.6 [996] Air Conditioning?](http://forums.pelicanparts.com/iconimages/porsche-964-993-technical-forum/3-2-vs-3-6-996-air-conditioning_ltr.gif)
