Quote:
Originally Posted by cairns
Now you're just showing your ignorance. You have anecdotal information and we're presenting you with facts:
They did not buy anything and were not customers.
Yes, no disagreement. Same as a lot of Starbucks "customers", most who are not asked to leave.
They were asked to leave and refused.
Yes, no disagreement, again, why them and not others. This is where it comes down to their feeling they were being treated unfairly. Maybe you guys tuck your balls between your legs when you think you are being **** on but not all of us do.
They were warned that if they didn't leave the police would be called.
Yup, and they doubled down. Obviously they felt strongly enough about their treatment they were willing to see it through.
The police were called.
Yup
They still refused to leave.
Yup
They were handcuffed and taken into custody.
Yup
They said they were victims of racism and sued.
Well, they went through all that because obviously they felt that's what it was from the start so what's your point.
You have any FACTS that show this is racism? If not maybe you should give it up. You're losing.
|
Do you have any FACTS that show it was not racism?
We have witness statements they were sitting quietly and did nothing to attract attention other than ask to use the bathroom.
Statements that include wondering why they were asked to leave when others doing the same were not the only difference being, well we know that already.
Based on that you have no option but to lean more to asking the question, was this racism, than concluding, as you have done with the same facts, that it was not.