Quote:
Originally Posted by Esel Mann
It takes zero effort to request that non-deceptive communication be considered private/confidential/etc.
Even if this were the case (it clearly wasn't) the fact that the communication is deceptive, would nullify the request.
Simple, easy, breezy. Pretty much a non problem for people who are not deceptive. For those that are deceptive, well.....
|
Here's a simple experiment you (or Tarek too) can try.
Inform all your business associates (as is the case here with Tarek) and friends for that matter that their conversations with you may be recorded and publicized later as you desire.
Let us know how that goes for you.
Quote:
He could have said as much, yes. However if that was to have happened, then it would be like so many other cases on this forum. Simple words and one has to wonder what is what. Between the OP's heads up post and Tarek's communication with a cornholio, it seems pretty clear there is a person attempting to make a deceptive Porsche sale.
Had it simply been Tarek's words, one would have to pause and contemplate.
This isn't rocket science.
|
In this case, I would take Tarek at his word given the collaborating evidence from Dan the touring man.