[fintstone]

Originally Posted by Tervuren

None of us have enough information on why they got married, what their agreements were, or what happened with that.

We can choose to fill in blanks and spin things to say the husband was bad, or the wife was bad, but ultimately we lack that information.

But to F a woman for multiple years, maintaining a bad relationship, there is no way to spin that.

If she was trying to use him to "trade up", he should have taken a different path.

If he was trying to keep her weak and vulnerable so he could use her, that was wrong.

There is no way to spin what the sue-ed guy did as good.

He did wrong, really wrong.

When it comes to whether the Husband was a good husband or not, we would have to take the word of liars.

I'm not gonna make that judgement based on dishonest people unless I have first hand information one way or the other.

Hopefully this helps send a strong message, and maybe stops some skunks from taking advantage of women in weak places.

She cheated...and not just once, but over a prolonged period which involved a great deal of planning and subterfuge. There is simply no excuse for that. That is a pretty good indicator of her character. Everything else is he said/she said.

Although the following does make one tend to believe she is not exactly a saint, but rather a manipulative beoch:

"A district court judge found in another case that Danielle King had sought a domestic violence protection order to gain an advantage in a civil suit and to protect her lover from being sued, assessing $15,000 in sanctions for a frivolous lawsuit, Foil said"

Read more here: https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/crime/article215577310.html#storylink=cpy