Quote:
Originally Posted by wdfifteen
Why?
Why assume the accuser is guilty of lying and he/shehas to prove they aren't? Why not assume the accused is guilty of assault or whatever and they have to prove they aren't?
|
Wow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowbob
I find Wd's stand on the burden of proof offensive.
|
No kidding. But you have to understand who you are dealing with - this clown has proven his utter stupidity "beyond a reasonable doubt" on so many occasions I've lost count.