Quote:
Originally Posted by red-beard
You come across fairly insulting for someone with 3 posts, all in this thread.
|
Only posted are technical facts. If insulted, then you are not reading technically. In technical discussions, no emotions exist or are relevant. When a conclusion is only justified by junk science reasoning, then it is wrong. Exposing urban myths insults no one. Especially when 'reasons why' come with supporting facts and numbers.
Quite bluntly exposed is an ESE lie. Nobody should be insulted by the Bryan report, et al. But one, who made a 'weak science' accusation, then posted classic junk science - ESE devices. Again, nobody is insulted. An obvious technical myth is exposed - by also providing the reasons why. He never posted a single reason to believe that ESE speculation. Anyone who does not provide 'reasons why' is suspect as dishonest or deceived. And that also insults no one. That is a technical reality.
Everything posted were and are facts - with reasons why it can be believed. Some paragraphs demonstrate how easily scams can be promoted and have been believed. That insults nobody - if one is reading technically; not emotionally.
Concepts such as ESE should result in a "I cannot believe I was so easily deceived" conclusions.
Apparently so many lies and myths must be unlearned (that can be hard). And plenty of well proven science, from over 100 years ago, must be learned. None of that insults anyone even though most did not know any of it.