Sigh, no. Here's how debate works. Someone, like Ted for example makes a claim: Deregulation has spurred the economy.
The next step in debate is someone says show me your supporting evidence. That's me, here I am:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun @ Tru6
You will want to list those regulations and the ones repealed and the effect of each.
|
Then Ted, or you as his proxy, says, hey, this regulation 50034.LL2.FG was repealed which resulted in $36 trillion of new taxable income every month. Here's where I got the math and supporting evidence...
Then I respond to that.
Here's the thing that you aren't asking yourself and I'm not quite sure why you aren't. Why can't you find 10 or 5 or 1 thoroughly analyzed example like the repeal of regulation 50034.LL2.FG?
I know you are googling all around and can't really come up with anything because no one has done the analysis because there isn't anything to analyze, and have had to resort to generalities and truisms to support your case, but why aren't you scratching your head wondering why you can't find anything detailed. Other than, "It's not my thing."
