Quote:
Originally Posted by darrin
Robert -- looks like you're new to this forum and are likely not yet familiar with our nomenclature. As Juanbene indicated, the photos you posted are of a "narrow body" car -- specifically a car lacking rear fender flares, which were standard on all 911sc (and later) model cars. Since all 911sc model cars have rear fender flares and the car you posted does not, it is not a 911sc (even though it appears to have inherited a 911sc rear deck and spoiler at some point). IMO, the midyear 911s (1974-1977) are less desirable than the 911sc and later models, as their 2.7l magnesium-block engine has heat-related issues that were largely resolved with the 3.0 aluminum block engines used in the 911sc. So, while the PCA post for this car could still be a scam, it does appear to accurately portray a 1976 911s . . .
|
Thank you darrin for being so welcoming. I did a little reading on the 2.7 and people are saying to rebuild them with time certs or case savers. Which one would be better assuming current owner hasn't already done so.
@JMS those will most certainly have to go if I buy this car lol.