View Single Post
red-beard red-beard is offline
canna change law physics
 
red-beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Houston, Tejas
Posts: 43,429
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainz01 View Post
Per the UOA report, looks like he was using M1 0w40 which is factory spec. I don’t recall seeing moly in M1 0w40, and the zinc and phosphorous look a little low, so I can’t help but wonder if it was a different oil. The iron is on the high side, but not catastrophically so. Otherwise, the report looks good for the miles.

The TBN of 6 is healthy, M1 starts around 10 or 11 if I recall. But the viscosity looks low, though that’s the usual complaint for why many think that M1 0w40 isn’t enough oil for the M96 engines. The RL forums are filled with folks suggesting more expensive/thicker oils that are more shear resistant than M1 0w40.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That seems really high for a gasoline engine. Diesel I would understand. On our Landfill gas machines, the TBN starts around 5.5-6. And we have H2S in the gas, which causes acidification when it burns.
__________________
James
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994)
Red-beard for President, 2020
Old 05-05-2019, 05:35 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)