Quote:
Originally Posted by PorscheGAL
It's my understanding, that J&J is very different than Purdue (Sackler family) in the way it is marketed, prescribed and abused. I could be wrong. The only reason J&J is being sued is because the others have settled.
|
Perhaps, but if the OK AG proves what he laid out in his opening statement, they were bad actors. But to me the more interesting issue is the extent to which they should have to pay for the negative externalities of their business, regardless of their intentions.