View Single Post
Tippy Tippy is online now
Chain fence eating turbo
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by spuggy View Post
I used to think that, and was keeping my eyes open for one.

But reading what Jim says - and seeing max speed in 1st between G50/0x and G50/50 is only a few MPH (depending on shift point, naturally) - starting to think not tall enough to be flexible/useful.

The factory used 3.154 for 1st gear in 2 N/A cars (both the Swiss 964 with the G50/04, and the 964 RS with the G50/10). So not all that tall...

Hence asking how folks got on with the 4-speed 1st - quite a bit taller at 2.6..
My friend had a 965. The 1st was so much more useful than my NA 87 Carrera 3.2 G50/01. The rollout made 1st so fun. Mine just hits the rev limiter in no time, then off to 2nd. I have too much torque to benefit from the low 1st gear - hence my belief the G50/50 is the PERFECT gearbox for most turbo 911's IMO.

The more torque you make, the less gearing you need. Small displacement 4 cylinder cars use 4:1+ 1st gears with 4:1+ rear diff ratios (at least back in the day).

Top fuel dragsters run direct to 36" tall tires.

All relative I suppose..
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, Treadstone full bay IC, 70mm TB, TiAL F46 WG, HKS 1 1/2" BOV, twin 044 pumps, MicroSquirt AMP'd w/GM smart coilpack, Bilstein coilovers, Tramont replica Speedlines (285's rr, 225's frt), Big Reds frt, 993 rr., tower brace, MOMO wheel
Old 09-06-2019, 10:13 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #35 (permalink)