Quote:
Originally Posted by sc_rufctr
Rant... It upsets me when I heard people deny the official story. That somehow this was a "conspiracy"... 
|
Perhaps you should read more about it, and remain open to different possibilities?
--------------------------
Building 7 collapsed as a whole at free fall speed with only partial damage.
(These are highly trained professionals risking their careers to give their professional opinions btw..)
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-09-05/major-university-study-finds-fire-did-not-bring-down-tower-7-911
Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of
WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
In fact, as TFTP reported in July, history was made in regard to 9/11 as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day.
The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”
-------------------------
Building 6 just blew up even before the towers fell.
Does that look strange to you?
No Explanation For Building #6 Implosion On 9/11 – The Millennium Report