[Jeff Higgins]

I fail to see how Popeye's can be held responsible for Mr. Deriance Ra’Shaiel Hughes' actions. He clearly took it upon himself to conduct himself in a manner inconsistent with Popeye's corporate policy. Now if he had done something that Popeye's corporate policy actually condones, and that action had resulted in the woman's injury then, yes, Popeye's should be held responsible. Just because this thug happened to be their employee and at work at the time should not mean that the company is responsible for his criminal actions. They clearly have no way of predicting or preventing this kind of behavior, and should in no way be held responsible for their employee's violent outburst.