View Single Post
jcommin jcommin is offline
Misunderstood User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,805
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdfifteen View Post
Depends on how you define long distance travel. I would say anything over about 500 miles would be better done by air.

But back to the OP. The practical limit on "high speed" seems to be somewhere below 300 kph, or about 180 mph.

I used to fly from Dayton to Chicago to a place on N. Michigan Avenue a couple of times a year. Air time was less than an hour, but travel time was 4-5 hours or more depending on the time of day. I could drive there in 6 hours on a good day, 7 if traffic was bad. I don't think a train - even a high speed train - would save any time over air and maybe would take longer than driving, but it would be a lot more relaxing than driving or flying.
I have lived this many times. I have had 6 hour flights from Chicago to Detroit. I still travel for work and many times when I'm traveling with collegues, we rent a van or SUV. It is so nice to be a passenger and take in the scenery. You miss allot when you are the driver.
__________________
Jim

1983 944n/a
2003 Mercedes CLK 500 - totaled. Sanwiched on the Kennedy Expressway
Old 02-08-2020, 06:23 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #25 (permalink)