Quote:
Originally posted by 350HP930
So I take it that you were as up in arms and defesive of the commander in chief when the vast conspiracy of which you speak was attacking Clinton?
|
No, again. The stake with Clinton were not as high. It was like Hugh Grant and the hooker. . .did he deserve such intense press, likely not. Did the it matter much at all?. . not really. . .just another entertaining blip.
However, when a network of thugs with big cash start buying big hits, (9/11, antrax in envelopes) it is time to stop the typical political bickering.
The thing is, nobody (including the french) questioned whether Saddam had WMD.
Furthermore, Just because the WMD haven't been accounted for doesn't mean they were not, or are not, in Iraq.
Though, here, the anti-Bush crowd is attempting to revise history, in Saddams favor, if it will make Bush look bad.
They, the anti-Bush crowd, are running around like children . .
'you cant find the WMD - -nah-nah-n'-nah-nah.
'