Quote:
Originally Posted by rusnak
As Victor Davis Hansen has said, there is no way that we can think California was not exposed to the virus. I think the first known case in California is now November. I have to go back and look for the article about that. I also understand that the Stanford researchers believe that the number of cases may have been underestimated by 50-fold.
|
Run:
So why did CA avoid a spike in deaths well over and above the normal background? We know the disease kills. NYC is painfully obvious as are other places.
Does CA not have cites like NYC? No super dense population areas? I don't know enough about LA or SFC to know any better.