Quote:
Originally Posted by island911
Oh, please... This all started out of my post saying: We should all be VERY happy that this virus is not a huge threat to the majority of the population.
"huge threat" is my description, not yours. And is what you are taking issue with.
I think of "huge threat" as killing people. That wasn't good enough for your interpretation. So I accommodated and considered hospitalization as good enough - but still no where near 60%.
You can't articulate what you interpret "huge threat" to be so you get insulting. WTF man? You're better than that.
|
I didn't get insulting. I'm just not going to argue my definition of huge threat vs yours. It's a waste of time. I've articulated what a huge threat is. If 60% of American adults have health issues that make this virus potentially deadly for them, that's a huge threat to a majority of people. Death doesn't define a "huge threat" and is honestly a terribly limited way of viewing what constitutes a huge threat. People potentially suffering lifelong issues related to this virus is a huge threat. People thought chicken pox didn't pose a threat until we learned that later on in life it could cause further complications.