Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahler9th
Thanks for posting. Impressive. They seem to have commitment and resources. Good for them.
But likely not every hospital or hospital system's priority for expenditure of resources.
I used to visit there a lot in the mid-80's.. I was there so often that the guy at the Marriott with the white hat and red feather always remembered my name. I think I still have a towel or bar of soap from that Marriott (a corporation that I am sure is hurtin' big time).
I took a run at lunch time today and there were youth programs in the park and the tennis courts seemed open. That's good.
What if we "knew" that with "everything" open, folks would still not crowd onto planes or into bars or restaurants? So with "open" GDP takes $X hit with Y deaths and Z costs of hospitalization, and with "not everything open," GDP takes $X hit with A far less than Y deaths and Q far less than Z hospitalization costs?
Now if we had "state" media and a "state" healthcare system and a different legal system, we could control all of this.
|
I don't see where it would be much of a resource drag. All of the data is simple and easily found. Initial set up of the charts might take some time, but shouldn't be overwhelming. That is the type of info we need to know what needs to be done.