Quote:
Originally Posted by Sooner or later
From the article. This didn't happen.
"So: Sars-Cov-2 isn’t all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viruses do — which is what we’re observing globally right now"
|
Agreed. That is why I don't share it as gospel, nor do I share it to prove a side. This article is ripe for grabbing at stuff to support for debate. That isn't my intent. I could see where Stadler would view it "
merely a seasonal cold virus" as that from his perspective. I was more intrigued by the concept of shattered viral genomes interpreted as reinfections on pcr testing. That could explain much. The partial immunity concept also fascinates me (as a puzzle piece) :
It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged. This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.
Even if true, I would quantify that as one piece of a larger puzzle, which we may never know the exact answer to, which is a bummer, because, I'd really like to know the exact details.
Earlier in this thread the concept of the 9mm vs 45 was made, then the idea of Gomez and the parachute (or someone from the munsters... or something like that
). I personally think both sides of that might be right to some degree. For me- more info needed.