|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,794
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabmando
I'd run the 87 octane and wouldn't look back. I've ran both the 87 ethanol and the 91 no ethanol in a few of my cars and never noticed the difference except in the cost of the fuel.
|
Hmmm. You should get around 10% better mileage on the no alcohol, but is that worth the premium paid? Cindy's Toyota gets 87 gasahol. I run no booze in the Mustang because it's variable factory tune actually delivers more power with higher octane. Says so right there in the owners manual..
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent."
-Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.)
|