Quote:
Originally Posted by pwd72s
Might have trouble finding a nice '65='66 'Stang fastback and still make that budget..
Ditto on any Nomad...that '55 looks especially sweet. But yes, very cool and fun. Dunno how sporty tho...neither deliver a lot of performance.
Maybe something on the not fast but funky side? Early 50's Chevy sedan delivery, something like that?
|
Yeah, I'd love a fastback but those are probably $50k+ in decent condition. Was thinking about the normal body.
Quote:
Originally Posted by racer
How often will you need a back seat? Some of the booster seats of today are monsterous. Some parents waver about the idea of demanding Airbags in cars with kids these days.
We all know that the glossy nostalgia machines are on BAT.. so go confuse yourself  |
Back seat would be weekends only for the next ten years or so. My daughter is nearly three so we've got some time with her being small enough to fit in a small rear seat.
BAT browsing is probably the best idea! Thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
What does your wife drive? If not an SUV type then get a Cayenne. Probably outdo your 911.
|
She drives an Audi Q5 which she really likes. I actually tried to get her into a Cayenne but she didn't really like them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by look 171
Not keen on Japanese SPORTS cars but a mid 60s Mustang? Is this about driving dynamics or looks and emotions? Those Rustangs drive like crap stock even if tricked a bit, still an old car that doesn't not handle well. I hear good things about those BRZs (newer ones suppose to have more power) or the new Civic is a lot of fun but looks like siht with all the fake vents and stuff on there. Theydrive everybit like a sports cars should, so I hear.
|
All of the above. I don't want a Honda CRX or something of the like sitting in my driveway, though I'm sure its a ton of fun to drive. Old Mustangs can be modernized to drive better relatively easily.