Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
I watched both of their careers. Jack was great, no question. In my estimation, Tiger was better. Tiger had to deal with more injury and more fame, both of which hampered him.
It's like Schumacher vs. Senna. I'd bet on Senna. And I'd take Senna over anybody that came before him.
Opinions...
|
Problem with picking either of these is they might have ended up dead after a much shorter career.
They both had higher levels of risk acceptence, and the cars and tracks were safer for each.
How many crashes were these two in that if it had been a tree lined F1 track of old, in a F1 car of old, would have been career or life ending?
A lot of those in the older days that were greats never racked up the win count or championship count because they were dead.
