[Kansas]

Don't understand the disparity in values of air cooled 911 models from '74-'89. We're some 32 to 46 years removed from all these models. Who really cares about the superiority of the G50 v the 915, or the extra HP of the later years, or the pathetic heating and AC systems, or the pros and cons of the fuel injection systems? Most modern V6 Accords and a lot of minivans will outrun these models, not to mention post better 0-60 times. All else being equal, is there really a $20-30K difference between the mid year cars, the SCs and the 3.2s? By now, most problems of the various years have been well sorted: chain tensioners, retrofitted magnesium casings, and upgraded AC systems. They ALL share the same driving experience that make them truly unique and highly sought after. I heard a Porsche valuator a few years ago predict that all air cooled 911s would eventually settle at equal valuations. Now, I don't know if he was including 964s and 993s, but I would tend to agree when it comes to the g body cars. A number of recent BAT auctions seem to be indicating this trend as well.