View Single Post
rusnak rusnak is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by thor66 View Post
Sorry but you're kind of stupid. Why don't you read this?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_in_California
OK dumbass, the PPIC is cited as the source for your little "Wikipedia" blog (really ??) that makes you some sort of Internet Expert.

But even in that article, the following uses are defined for the past two decades:

Environmental uses (meaning water that is flushed out to the ocean, for salmon and Shamoo the Whale): 38.3 Million Acre Feet.

Urban uses, excluding urban recharge basins: 7.9 MAF

Agriculture: 31 MAF


Summary:

Enviro: 38.3 MAF - 49.61%
Urban: 7.9 MAF = 10.23%
Ag: 31 MAF = 40.16 %

In wet years, the percentage that goes out to the ocean can equal over 60% of all water consumed in California, meaning that it IS NOT SAVED FOR DRY YEARS !

THAT IS WHAT THE DEMS IN CALFORNIA DO. THEY FLUSH THE WATER OUT TO THE OCEAN RATHER THAN SAVE IT FOR DROUGHT YEARS.

This is my earlier point.
Old 05-21-2021, 06:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #56 (permalink)