Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins
*Sigh* (again...)
We used this incident as a springboard into a deeper discussion, since the details of this specific incident are not that well known at this time. I have, over the course of this discussion, made it quite clear that the specifics of this young man's own situation were pure conjecture on my part and that I was only using them as a starting point for a broader discussion. You missed that, of course, because you were too lazy to go back and read through this thread and asked for a summary of some very specific aspects of this conversation, which I provided (certainly not of the entire conversation). You are well behind this conversation at this point. Perhaps you should now take the time to go back and read through it. Or not - your choice. Just don't expect me to respond when you again rehash something we covered a few pages back.
|
Just that everyone has to wade through the multipost multipage verbiage which is based on a conjecture and not realize that is the case, including myself prior to this. Now I know.
Carry on with the sermon then !