Quote:
Originally Posted by masraum
And if you are the face/representative of a company or entity, and you want to remain in that position, don't put yourself in the position for the company to have to worry about "is he making us look bad or should that have been fine?"
|
I would agree, but that would also apply to disciplinary action.
What if the response to an incident by the company results in a larger negative involving more people than what the employee originally said?
I already do not make effort to watch major TV sports expressly because of the fake atmosphere that I observed in increasing enforcement.
It's been nearly ten years since I went somewhere expressly to watch a NASCAR race on TV.
They lost me with the enforcement of what was said during the broadcasts into a hollow and fake world.
Now I watch amateur racing where a colorful world with variety still exists.
I would still expect some boundries for broadcast, but this is too tight.
In a case where an obvious positive take away exists let it go that way.