Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
That is the data set that I was thinking of. His analysis may be flawed, or it may not be detailed enough, but it pretty well puts the lie to the idea that 90% of these new hospitalizations and deaths are among the unvaccinated. I don’t think he could ever **** it up that bad.
|
You hang your hat on a lot of dubious sources- former FBI agent Jesus freak, that discredited clown Alex Berenson, redstate.com, meaninginhistory.blogspot.com, some Brit kid. You clearly follow anything that supports your agenda. This makes your opinions slanted and untrustworthy.
I look at credible sources and work within them. I'm not big on folks who discredit those sources. I think our former president corrupted the CDC while he was in office by threatening peoples jobs for not following his agenda, but I think prior to that and after his administration the CDC is back to having integrity.
BTW, I do recognize the strong possibility that the Israeli study through MHS in its preprint stage may hold some valid information to be accepted. We shall see after its peer review. However, I don't think the breakthrough percentages are the key factor. The key factor is reduction in hospitalization and death.
By the way- no response to my question where you got this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
It has been described as significantly less deadly than the original, that factor could explain the graph as much as anything else.
|