Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
So, you only want to debate information that comes from sources you approve of? How do you know what he saying isn’t credible? You haven’t even considered it.
Go ahead, dissect what he says and tell me where he’s wrong. Don’t hide behind your bull**** argument that he is simply not credible, show me where he’s wrong.
I don’t know your politics but you sing from the liberal him book so, until proven otherwise, I’ll lump you in with those *******s.
You and your buddies that won’t even deign to read something from an opposing viewpoint, much less consider it, are the pathetic ones.
|
Look at post #418. I said "I am willing to look at the cogent points you find in there. Please share those."
Your useless reply in post #420: "Click on the links yourself, ya lazy turd…"
Look at post #422. I said "Since you asked so nicely, I looked at the link. It looks to me like there's no there there. Is the crux of that that the vaccine under the EUA (Emergency Use Act) is different from the approved "Comirnaty" vaccine? I'm not seeing the difference, other than some conspiracy theory.
Please enlighten me.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna#:~:text=The%20FDA%2Dapproved%20Pfizer%2DBioNT ech,any%20safety%20or%20effectiveness%20concerns.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download "
Your useless reply in post #424: "The FBI agent, the guy you derided for no good reason whatsoever, spells it out in his article. Read it, I’m not going to retype it for you."
Part of your post #463: "It has been described as significantly less deadly than the original, that factor could explain the graph as much as anything else."
My response post #464: "Where?
I don't know if the monoclonal antibody treatment (like Trump got) is in wide use yet, but it's very effective if used early on or even prophylactically. It's being heavily promoted now.
"Some data suggest the Delta variant might cause more severe illness than previous strains in unvaccinated persons. In two different studies from Canada and Scotland, patients infected with the Delta variant were more likely to be hospitalized than patients infected with Alpha or the original virus strains."
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-variant.html "
My post #481: "BTW, I do recognize the strong possibility that the Israeli study through MHS in its preprint stage may hold some valid information to be accepted. We shall see after its peer review. However, I don't think the breakthrough percentages are the key factor. The key factor is reduction in hospitalization and death.
By the way- no response to my question where you got this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
It has been described as significantly less deadly than the original, that factor could explain the graph as much as anything else.
|
Then parts this gem of yours #482: "...Furthermore, I’m not endorsing everything I post here, I simply am posting things that I find worth reading, for whatever reason. I read probably 500 things a day on the Internet, if not more, and I realize that not everybody will see everything that’s out there. It’s virtually impossible. Read what I post, I don’t read what I post, I don’t care. I do from time to time offer my opinion on something and it’s generally pretty easy to tell what I think about some thing because I come right out and say it... As for your other question, when we first started learning about the Delta variant, we were told that it’s much more contagious but less likely to be serious. That was the chatter in the news, months and months ago. Fauci and the CDC and the other idiots may have changed their tune, I can tell you right now that I’m not gonna pay much attention to it because their primary purpose is fear mongering. They have no credibility with me, you can believe them at your peril.
This Covid pandemic is about far more than just the goddamn bug, it’s a political weapon being used against all of us, some of you guys need to wake the **** up."
Reply here: Wow.
The question came up about % of doctors that are vaccinated. I quoted 96%
Your post #504: "I’ve heard that same 96% number in three different polls.
That’s the first clue that it’s a bull**** number.
Reminds me of the 93% the number that got thrown around with respect to global warming.
Or the 17 intelligence community agencies that agreed…."
I said okay, it's 20%. Your missed the joke.
Your post #506: "I have no idea what the number is. 20% doesn’t sound right, either."
I read your garbage links and I'm done. If you want to quote stuff from conspiracytheories.com or tinfoilhat.org, go ahead. I'm not going to waste any more time arguing with someone equipped with the mind of a child.