Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Carlton
What does this mean? Yes- I'm familiar. What does it mean to you?
|
It means that fundamentally and permanently altering a structure (the human genome) leads to it being vulnerable to new external challenges. We modern humans have survived world-wide waves of virii and bacterial and become the dominant species through natural adaptation and our structures have allowed this. Our bodies contain 10x as many bacterial cells as "human" and they are spliced and intertwined with our own genetics. We exist in a synthesis with nature.
You cant fk with something without completely altering it.
So similar to Monsanto splicing the Round-Up resistance gene into vegetable DNA, this mRNA seems to be spliced into our own cellular communication.
We've been studying genetic for what half a century and are still infancy, and then along the road here comes a powerful core group of "medicinal experts" who suddenly want to alter the entirety of humanity? How many engines have been blown up before the turbo waste-gate was figured out? And that's relatively basic engineering.....not genetic with potential environmental engineering. Oh and Win10 still crashes on a regular basis. Good thing there is a reset button. Thanks but no thanks, I won't be first in that line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Carlton
I don't know what you're saying here. A section of RNA is not a receptor site. The mRNA vaccines can be somewhat easily changed (modified) the tell the recipient's cells to make a different protein that would appear on a future variant.
|
I'm understanding RNA was a parallel source code to DNA which became subservient to it?
(that's my KISS understanding)
https://www.britannica.com/science/RNA
"
This chemical lability of RNA, compared with DNA, which does not have a reactive −OH group in the same position on the sugar moiety (deoxyribose), is thought to be one reason why DNA evolved to be the preferred carrier of genetic information in most organisms. "
So the idea is to control the output instead of the DNA itself?
The RNA is just a translator and assistant?
What if that all goes wrong? What if that translator instructs the functional systems or DNA to do the wrong things?
The number of vaccine-related incidences is growing exponentially.
per the website link:
"Most vaccines contain a weakened or killed bacteria or virus. However, scientists have developed a new type of vaccine that uses a molecule called messenger RNA (or mRNA for short) rather than part of an actual bacteria or virus"
I think they are using the definition of "vaccine" incorrectly again.
A forced alteration of the cell from within is not a vaccine. It is a virus.
Say it and thousand times still doesn't make it so.