|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW Cheese Country
Posts: 13,611
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by john70t
not a pilot but..
1) Aren't Ultralights restricted to lower airspace restriction than General Aviation?
-That would mean she would getting constantly beat up and bounced around by ground effects in a lightweight CF airframe.
-It's like riding a motocross bike with a solid axle.
-Or a roller coaster for hours.
-No setting autopilot and cruising on the trade winds in a Cadillac ride.
2). The Ultralight category is much slower.
-180 mph in the impressive SHARK vs. 280 mph in a similar looking Lancair Legacy is a HUGE difference in speed.
-Driving across country on dirt back roads instead of freeways.
3). Fuel capacity and weight limits equal more landings.
-The design of the SHARK looks like it will have a higher stall speed.
-No small airports. More communication and more potential problems in foreign lands.
Those factors alone make her journey significant.
|
It is equivalent of a light sport aircraft here, other than the speed restrictions. Like a J3 Cub or Sonex type plane.
__________________
Brent
The X15 was the only aircraft I flew where I was glad the engine quit. - Milt Thompson.
"Don't get so caught up in your right to dissent that you forget your obligation to contribute." Mrs. James to her son Chappie.
|