Quote:
Originally Posted by Sooner or later
The paper seems fine. What does Subremanian say about the paper and some reports that the paper makes a case that the vaccines are ineffective?
“That conclusion is misleading and inaccurate, This paper supports vaccination as an important strategy for reducing infection and transmission, along with hand-washing, mask-wearing, and physical distancing.”
“Other research has clearly and definitively established that the vaccines significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization and mortality.”
|
Do you mean interpretation ?
Exactly which part?
Considering who wrote it I think it's fairly accurate.
Population and Development Studies
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences
Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA
S. V. Subramanian
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
S. V. Subramanian
Mike