[look 171]

Originally Posted by Deschodt

Plus they are somewhat overrated IMO, probably based on their good looks.
Very smooth engine but also very linear so not as exciting as one might hope, in stock form too softly sprung, too quiet an exhaust, exact same "yawn" interior as a 911SC (with more warning lights on the dash, often ON because something is wrong), a squeaky windshield, an annoying immobilizer that can leave you stranded, expensive valve guide repairs / secondary air port coking up, etc... The most "GT" of all 911s I owned and at the same time, both the prettiest & most dissapointing to drive to me. Of course that is just my opinion (based on a string of ownership from 356 to 991) but to me it falls in the "neither-nor" zone, not classic enough for that raw experience, not quick and modern enough for the speed/reliable/carplay experience...for the insane money. If they were 20K cheaper then no problem, because they are pretty and all my gripes are fixable aftermarket... And now I will put on my kevlar helmet and seek cover.

(Did I mention it's the prettiest 911 even penned?)

I have to agree with you. My old 930 which drives like a truck with stiff suspension drives more like a proper 911 then my 993. Yep, its the prettiest of all 911 imo especially the turbo with the big hips