Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobra
No different than here, it is all about control of the plebes
The CCP vaxx is really not any worse than the ones they used here.
None of them are effective in preventing infection, none of them are durable, and none prevent the spread of the disease. That is why they changed the definition, so it would fit what they are currently pushing.
The powers that be have been lying about this from the jump, here and in Pandaland.
|
The very limited clinical data released on SinoVac, Cansino, etc vaccines was distinctly unimpressive, and then they stopped releasing data. Countries that started buying Chinese vaccines have switched to buying other ones. Just as important, China does not appear to have been keeping up the boosters, so most Chinese who are vaccinated got their initial doses over a year ago, and those vaccines' protection likely fades just like other vaccines.
The Chinese popln is going to be pretty fertile ground for Covid, if they hastily abandon zero-Covid and "let 'er rip". If China has a death rate not far off the US, 1MM deaths in 300MM implies 4-5MM of 1.4BN (coincidentally, about what India is belived to have actually suffered with about 1.4BN popln). Maybe Xi can hold it down to 1MM, but doing so will basically mean reverting to zero-Covid type lockdowns (in addition to massive lying)- except now he wouldn't be able to call it "zero" Covid any more.
Why is this interesting to me? If China drops zero-Covid, Chinese stocks will absolutely rip (only my view, not investment advice, blah blah), and it will be important to know if its a short rip that you need to jump on then jump off in a couple months. My view is that if China doesn't do the preparation I mentioned, before dropping zero-Covid, then you'd want to leave your seat belt unfastened.