Quote:
Originally posted by WOODPIE
snip...
Can you see why I'm having so much trouble? But let me link it up for you. You are saying that "Marriage should only be defined as a union between a male and a female. That is the way it has always been, and it has served our society very well. So it should remain as such. Homosexuals knew the law before they became homosexuals, if they don't like it they should not have become homosexuals, or they should leave the country, or they should try to change the law, or they should break the law and suffer the consequences."
snip....
There are other ways to do this; what way do you think is a more correct way?
Ed
more snip.....
|
OK, I'll allow your paraphrase of my convoluted argument.
I don't know what the answer is. Yes, there SHOULD be a way to legitimize a union between two people.
The way it is being done in San Francisco is not it.
Apologies to Rosie O'Donnell, I didn't mean to mess up her last name.